Efficient Fairness-Performance Pareto Front Computation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There is a well known intrinsic trade-off between the fairness of a representation and the performance of classifiers derived from the representation. Due to the complexity of optimisation algorithms in most modern representation learning approaches, for a given method it may be non-trivial to decide whether the obtained fairness-performance curve of the method is optimal, i.e., whether it is close to the true Pareto front for these quantities for the underlying data distribution. In this paper we propose a new method to compute the optimal Pareto front, which does not require the training of complex representation models. We show that optimal fair representations possess several useful structural properties, and that these properties enable a reduction of the computation of the Pareto Front to a compact discrete problem. We then also show that these compact approximating problems can be efficiently solved via off-the shelf concave-convex programming methods. Since our approach is independent of the specific model of representations, it may be used as the benchmark to which representation learning algorithms may be compared. We experimentally evaluate the approach on a number of real world benchmark datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.
Builds on
25 of 42 references.
References · 25
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
- 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
- 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
- 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
- 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
- 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
13 more
- 2018Invariant Representations without Adversarial Trainingcited by 111
- 2018Learning Controllable Fair Representationscited by 83
- 2022Fair and Optimal Classification via Post-Processingcited by 50
- 2021Controllable Guarantees for Fair Outcomes via Contrastive Information Estimationcited by 45
- 2021Fair Normalizing Flowscited by 38
- 2016Disciplined Convex-Concave Programmingcited by 29
- 2022FairGBM: Gradient Boosting with Fairness Constraintscited by 25
- 2021Group-Aware Threshold Adaptation for Fair Classificationcited by 21
- 2022FARE: Provably Fair Representation Learning with Practical Certificatescited by 21
- 2022Learning fair representation with a parametric integral probability metriccited by 20
- 2023Aleatoric and Epistemic Discrimination: Fundamental Limits of Fairness Interventionscited by 19
- 2023Classifier Calibration with ROC-Regularized Isotonic Regressioncited by 19
- 2024Utility-Fairness Trade-Offs and How to Find Themcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.