mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Distraction is All You Need for Fairness

arXiv 2203.07593 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bias in training datasets must be managed for various groups in classification tasks to ensure parity or equal treatment. With the recent growth in artificial intelligence models and their expanding role in automated decision-making, ensuring that these models are not biased is vital. There is an abundance of evidence suggesting that these models could contain or even amplify the bias present in the data on which they are trained, inherent to their objective function and learning algorithms; Many researchers direct their attention to this issue in different directions, namely, changing data to be statistically independent, adversarial training for restricting the capabilities of a particular competitor who aims to maximize parity, etc. These methods result in information loss and do not provide a suitable balance between accuracy and fairness or do not ensure limiting the biases in training. To this end, we propose a powerful strategy for training deep learning models called the Distraction module, which can be theoretically proven effective in controlling bias from affecting the classification results. This method can be utilized with different data types (e.g., Tabular, images, graphs, etc.). We demonstrate the potency of the proposed method by testing it on UCI Adult and Heritage Health datasets (tabular), POKEC-Z, POKEC-N and NBA datasets (graph), and CelebA dataset (vision). Using state-of-the-art methods proposed in the fairness literature for each dataset, we exhibit our model is superior to these proposed methods in minimizing bias and maintaining accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2022.

Builds on

46 of 69 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  6. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  7. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  8. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  9. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  10. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  11. 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
  12. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
34 more
  1. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  2. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  3. 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
  4. 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
  5. 2020Say No to the Discrimination: Learning Fair Graph Neural Networks with Limited Sensitive Attribute Informationcited by 168
  6. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  7. 2019Towards Fairer Datasets: Filtering and Balancing the Distribution of the People Subtree in the ImageNet Hierarchycited by 156
  8. 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
  9. 2019On the Fairness of Disentangled Representationscited by 144
  10. 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
  11. 2020REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 136
  12. 2019Compositional Fairness Constraints for Graph Embeddingscited by 126
  13. 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
  14. 2019Fair Generative Modeling via Weak Supervisioncited by 114
  15. 2018Invariant Representations without Adversarial Trainingcited by 111
  16. 2021Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolationcited by 109
  17. 2018Learning Controllable Fair Representationscited by 83
  18. 2019Training individually fair ML models with Sensitive Subspace Robustnesscited by 73
  19. 2016A causal framework for discovering and removing direct and indirect discriminationcited by 71
  20. 2016Learning to Pivot with Adversarial Networkscited by 55
  21. 2018Training Well-Generalizing Classifiers for Fairness Metrics and Other Data-Dependent Constraintscited by 53
  22. 2019Mitigating Information Leakage in Image Representations: A Maximum Entropy Approachcited by 48
  23. 2021Controllable Guarantees for Fair Outcomes via Contrastive Information Estimationcited by 45
  24. 2021Consistent Instance False Positive Improves Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 40
  25. 2021TabFairGAN: Fair Tabular Data Generation with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 34
  26. 2016Achieving non-discrimination in data releasecited by 23
  27. 2020FairALM: Augmented Lagrangian Method for Training Fair Models with Little Regretcited by 22
  28. 2020Contrastive Examples for Addressing the Tyranny of the Majoritycited by 21
  29. 2020FairFaceGAN: Fairness-aware Facial Image-to-Image Translationcited by 21
  30. 2019Invariant Representations through Adversarial Forgettingcited by 20
  31. 2015A survey on measuring indirect discrimination in machine learningcited by 15
  32. 2021Attributing Fair Decisions with Attention Interventionscited by 10
  33. 2020Towards Fair Cross-Domain Adaptation via Generative Learningcited by 8
  34. 2016Do the Young Live in a "Smaller World" Than the Old? Age-Specific Degrees of Separation in Human Communicationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.