mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Olympus: a benchmarking framework for noisy optimization and experiment planning

arXiv 2010.04153 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2020stat.ML cs.LG physics.chem-phcited by 28

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Research challenges encountered across science, engineering, and economics can frequently be formulated as optimization tasks. In chemistry and materials science, recent growth in laboratory digitization and automation has sparked interest in optimization-guided autonomous discovery and closed-loop experimentation. Experiment planning strategies based on off-the-shelf optimization algorithms can be employed in fully autonomous research platforms to achieve desired experimentation goals with the minimum number of trials. However, the experiment planning strategy that is most suitable to a scientific discovery task is a priori unknown while rigorous comparisons of different strategies are highly time and resource demanding. As optimization algorithms are typically benchmarked on low-dimensional synthetic functions, it is unclear how their performance would translate to noisy, higher-dimensional experimental tasks encountered in chemistry and materials science. We introduce Olympus, a software package that provides a consistent and easy-to-use framework for benchmarking optimization algorithms against realistic experiments emulated via probabilistic deep-learning models. Olympus includes a collection of experimentally derived benchmark sets from chemistry and materials science and a suite of experiment planning strategies that can be easily accessed via a user-friendly python interface. Furthermore, Olympus facilitates the integration, testing, and sharing of custom algorithms and user-defined datasets. In brief, Olympus mitigates the barriers associated with benchmarking optimization algorithms on realistic experimental scenarios, promoting data sharing and the creation of a standard framework for evaluating the performance of experiment planning strategies

Key facts. Cited by 28 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 13.

28 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021HPOBench: A Collection of Reproducible Multi-Fidelity Benchmark Problems for HPOcited by 111
  2. 2021Benchmarking the Performance of Bayesian Optimization across Multiple Experimental Materials Science Domainscited by 46
  3. 2022GAUCHE: A Library for Gaussian Processes in Chemistrycited by 40
  4. 2023MetaBox: A Benchmark Platform for Meta-Black-Box Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  5. 2023Posterior Sampling-Based Bayesian Optimization with Tighter Bayesian Regret Boundscited by 15
  6. 2022Bayesian optimization with known experimental and design constraints for chemistry applicationscited by 11
  7. 2025Large language models as uncertainty-calibrated optimizers for experimental discoverycited by 10
  8. 2021Machine Learning with Knowledge Constraints for Process Optimization of Open-Air Perovskite Solar Cell Manufacturingcited by 8
  9. 2025Simplifying Bayesian Optimization Via In-Context Direct Optimum Samplingcited by 7
  10. 2026LLM-AutoSciLab: Closed-Loop Scientific Discovery via Active Experimentation with LLMscited by 7
  11. 2021Golem: An algorithm for robust experiment and process optimizationcited by 6
  12. 2022Graph Machine Learning for Design of High-Octane Fuelscited by 6
16 more
  1. 2026Unleashing LLMs in Bayesian Optimization: Preference-Guided Framework for Scientific Discoverycited by 5
  2. 2021Gemini: Dynamic Bias Correction for Autonomous Experimentation and Molecular Simulationcited by 2
  3. 2026Randomized Kriging Believer for Parallel Bayesian Optimization with Regret Boundscited by 2
  4. 2026BoLT: A Benchmark to Democratize Black-box Optimization Research for Expensive LLM Taskscited by 1
  5. 2026Evolutionary Intelligence for Scientific Discovery: From Evolutionary Computation to Cumulative Discovery Systemscited by 1
  6. 2021Opportunities for Machine Learning to Accelerate Halide Perovskite Commercialization and Scale-Upcited by 0
  7. 2025Bayesian Optimization for General Reaction Conditionscited by 0
  8. 2025CatBOX: A Categorical-Continuous Bayesian Optimization with Spectral Mixture Kernels for Accelerated Catalysis Experimentscited by 0
  9. 2026A Critical Examination of Active Learning Workflows in Materials Sciencecited by 0
  10. 2026Information Theoretic Bayesian Optimization over the Probability Simplexcited by 0
  11. 2026Towards Regret Guarantees for One-Step Lookahead Bayesian Optimizationcited by 0
  12. 2026BBOWP-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Black-Box Optimization Word Problemscited by 0
  13. 2026ChemWorld: Programmable Chemical Worlds for Controlled and Replayable Agent Experimentationcited by 0
  14. 2026Harnessing Large Language Models to Compile Task-Relevant Context into Bayesian Optimisationcited by 0
  15. 2026IQS-BO: In-Context Query Selection for Bayesian Optimisationcited by 0
  16. 2026Scientific Discovery under Validation Congestion via Multi-Fidelity Pairwise Rankingscited by 0