mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Machine Learning with Knowledge Constraints for Process Optimization of Open-Air Perovskite Solar Cell Manufacturing

arXiv 2110.01387 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2021cs.LG physics.app-phcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Perovskite photovoltaics (PV) have achieved rapid development in the past decade in terms of power conversion efficiency of small-area lab-scale devices; however, successful commercialization still requires further development of low-cost, scalable, and high-throughput manufacturing techniques. One of the critical challenges of developing a new fabrication technique is the high-dimensional parameter space for optimization, but machine learning (ML) can readily be used to accelerate perovskite PV scaling. Herein, we present an ML-guided framework of sequential learning for manufacturing process optimization. We apply our methodology to the Rapid Spray Plasma Processing (RSPP) technique for perovskite thin films in ambient conditions. With a limited experimental budget of screening 100 process conditions, we demonstrated an efficiency improvement to 18.5% as the best-in-our-lab device fabricated by RSPP, and we also experimentally found 10 unique process conditions to produce the top-performing devices of more than 17% efficiency, which is 5 times higher rate of success than the control experiments with pseudo-random Latin hypercube sampling. Our model is enabled by three innovations: (a) flexible knowledge transfer between experimental processes by incorporating data from prior experimental data as a probabilistic constraint; (b) incorporation of both subjective human observations and ML insights when selecting next experiments; (c) adaptive strategy of locating the region of interest using Bayesian optimization first, and then conducting local exploration for high-efficiency devices. Furthermore, in virtual benchmarking, our framework achieves faster improvements with limited experimental budgets than traditional design-of-experiments methods (e.g., one-variable-at-a-time sampling).

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2021.

Builds on

10 of 54 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 374
  2. 2017Batched Large-scale Bayesian Optimization in High-dimensional Spacescited by 117
  3. 2014Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraintscited by 109
  4. 2015Batch Bayesian Optimization via Local Penalizationcited by 104
  5. 2017Batched High-dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Structural Kernel Learningcited by 51
  6. 2021Benchmarking the Performance of Bayesian Optimization across Multiple Experimental Materials Science Domainscited by 48
  7. 2018High Dimensional Bayesian Optimization Using Dropoutcited by 40
  8. 2020Olympus: a benchmarking framework for noisy optimization and experiment planningcited by 29
  9. 2017High-Dimensional Materials and Process Optimization using Data-driven Experimental Design with Well-Calibrated Uncertainty Estimatescited by 14
  10. 2020Multi-fidelity machine-learning with uncertainty quantification and Bayesian optimization for materials design: Application to ternary random alloyscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

8 papers.