mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

KonX: Cross-Resolution Image Quality Assessment

arXiv 2212.05813 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2022cs.CV eess.IVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scale-invariance is an open problem in many computer vision subfields. For example, object labels should remain constant across scales, yet model predictions diverge in many cases. This problem gets harder for tasks where the ground-truth labels change with the presentation scale. In image quality assessment (IQA), downsampling attenuates impairments, e.g., blurs or compression artifacts, which can positively affect the impression evoked in subjective studies. To accurately predict perceptual image quality, cross-resolution IQA methods must therefore account for resolution-dependent errors induced by model inadequacies as well as for the perceptual label shifts in the ground truth. We present the first study of its kind that disentangles and examines the two issues separately via KonX, a novel, carefully crafted cross-resolution IQA database. This paper contributes the following: 1. Through KonX, we provide empirical evidence of label shifts caused by changes in the presentation resolution. 2. We show that objective IQA methods have a scale bias, which reduces their predictive performance. 3. We propose a multi-scale and multi-column DNN architecture that improves performance over previous state-of-the-art IQA models for this task, including recent transformers. We thus both raise and address a novel research problem in image quality assessment.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2022.

Builds on

20 of 65 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  2. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  3. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  4. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
  5. 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 387
  6. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 351
  7. 2015YFCC100M: The New Data in Multimedia Researchcited by 234
  8. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 221
  9. 2019Fixing the train-test resolution discrepancycited by 209
  10. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 165
  11. 2020MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 144
  12. 2020Transformer for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 76
8 more
  1. 2020Norm-in-Norm Loss with Faster Convergence and Better Performance for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 54
  2. 2019Effective Aesthetics Prediction with Multi-level Spatially Pooled Featurescited by 52
  3. 2020Fixing the train-test resolution discrepancy: FixEfficientNetcited by 31
  4. 2020DeepFL-IQA: Weak Supervision for Deep IQA Feature Learningcited by 29
  5. 2018Blind Predicting Similar Quality Map for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 21
  6. 2016Learning scale-variant and scale-invariant features for deep image classificationcited by 20
  7. 2018Crowd Counting by Adaptively Fusing Predictions from an Image Pyramidcited by 13
  8. 2018PerSIM: Multi-resolution Image Quality Assessment in the Perceptually Uniform Color Domaincited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 2.

9 papers.