mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving White-box Robustness of Pre-processing Defenses via Joint Adversarial Training

arXiv 2106.05453 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2021cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial noise. A range of adversarial defense techniques have been proposed to mitigate the interference of adversarial noise, among which the input pre-processing methods are scalable and show great potential to safeguard DNNs. However, pre-processing methods may suffer from the robustness degradation effect, in which the defense reduces rather than improving the adversarial robustness of a target model in a white-box setting. A potential cause of this negative effect is that adversarial training examples are static and independent to the pre-processing model. To solve this problem, we investigate the influence of full adversarial examples which are crafted against the full model, and find they indeed have a positive impact on the robustness of defenses. Furthermore, we find that simply changing the adversarial training examples in pre-processing methods does not completely alleviate the robustness degradation effect. This is due to the adversarial risk of the pre-processed model being neglected, which is another cause of the robustness degradation effect. Motivated by above analyses, we propose a method called Joint Adversarial Training based Pre-processing (JATP) defense. Specifically, we formulate a feature similarity based adversarial risk for the pre-processing model by using full adversarial examples found in a feature space. Unlike standard adversarial training, we only update the pre-processing model, which prompts us to introduce a pixel-wise loss to improve its cross-model transferability. We then conduct a joint adversarial training on the pre-processing model to minimize this overall risk. Empirical results show that our method could effectively mitigate the robustness degradation effect across different target models in comparison to previous state-of-the-art approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2021.

Builds on

40 of 59 references.

References · 40

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  5. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  8. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  9. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  10. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  11. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  12. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
28 more
  1. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  2. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 599
  3. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 555
  4. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 520
  5. 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 442
  6. 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
  7. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  8. 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 282
  9. 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 245
  10. 2020A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 180
  11. 2020Skip Connections Matter: On the Transferability of Adversarial Examples Generated with ResNetscited by 167
  12. 2020Adversarial Camouflage: Hiding Physical-World Attacks with Natural Stylescited by 126
  13. 2018Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNISTcited by 104
  14. 2019Defense Against Adversarial Attacks Using Feature Scattering-based Adversarial Trainingcited by 95
  15. 2019Defending Against Physically Realizable Attacks on Image Classificationcited by 66
  16. 2017Adversarial examples for generative modelscited by 58
  17. 2017APE-GAN: Adversarial Perturbation Elimination with GANcited by 57
  18. 2019Black-Box Adversarial Attack with Transferable Model-based Embeddingcited by 57
  19. 2017MagNet and "Efficient Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks" are Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 46
  20. 2018On the Robustness of the CVPR 2018 White-Box Adversarial Example Defensescited by 40
  21. 2019Detecting and Diagnosing Adversarial Images with Class-Conditional Capsule Reconstructionscited by 30
  22. 2018Resisting Adversarial Attacks using Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoderscited by 26
  23. 2020Stronger and Faster Wasserstein Adversarial Attackscited by 25
  24. 2017Residual Convolutional CTC Networks for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 21
  25. 2019On the Sensitivity of Adversarial Robustness to Input Data Distributionscited by 20
  26. 2018Adversarial Attacks on Variational Autoencoderscited by 19
  27. 2019Invert and Defend: Model-based Approximate Inversion of Generative Adversarial Networks for Secure Inferencecited by 4
  28. 2020Type I Attack for Generative Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.