mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ACL-QL: Adaptive Conservative Level in Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2412.16848 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 5

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Offline RL algorithms

Abstract (arXiv)

Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL), which operates solely on static datasets without further interactions with the environment, provides an appealing alternative to learning a safe and promising control policy. The prevailing methods typically learn a conservative policy to mitigate the problem of Q-value overestimation, but it is prone to overdo it, leading to an overly conservative policy. Moreover, they optimize all samples equally with fixed constraints, lacking the nuanced ability to control conservative levels in a fine-grained manner. Consequently, this limitation results in a performance decline. To address the above two challenges in a united way, we propose a framework, Adaptive Conservative Level in Q-Learning (ACL-QL), which limits the Q-values in a mild range and enables adaptive control on the conservative level over each state-action pair, i.e., lifting the Q-values more for good transitions and less for bad transitions. We theoretically analyze the conditions under which the conservative level of the learned Q-function can be limited in a mild range and how to optimize each transition adaptively. Motivated by the theoretical analysis, we propose a novel algorithm, ACL-QL, which uses two learnable adaptive weight functions to control the conservative level over each transition. Subsequently, we design a monotonicity loss and surrogate losses to train the adaptive weight functions, Q-function, and policy network alternatively. We evaluate ACL-QL on the commonly used D4RL benchmark and conduct extensive ablation studies to illustrate the effectiveness and state-of-the-art performance compared to existing offline DRL baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 56 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2024.

Builds on

56 of 82 references.

Closest ancestors · 20

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Hundreds Guide Millions: Adaptive Offline Reinforcement Learning with Expert Guidance4 Sep
  2. 2022A Survey on Offline Reinforcement Learning: Taxonomy, Review, and Open Problems2 Mar
  3. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning12 Oct
  4. 2021A Workflow for Offline Model-Free Robotic Reinforcement Learning22 Sep
  5. 2021Conservative Data Sharing for Multi-Task Offline Reinforcement Learning16 Sep
  6. 2021Conservative Offline Distributional Reinforcement Learning12 Jul
  7. 2021Offline RL Without Off-Policy Evaluation16 Jun
  8. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning12 Jun
  9. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic Regularization14 Mar
  10. 2021S4RL: Surprisingly Simple Self-Supervision for Offline Reinforcement Learning10 Mar
  11. 2021COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization16 Feb
  12. 2020PLAS: Latent Action Space for Offline Reinforcement Learning14 Nov
8 more
  1. 2020Critic Regularized Regression26 Jun
  2. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning8 Jun
  3. 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimization27 May
  4. 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning12 May
  5. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems4 May
  6. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning15 Apr
  7. 2020Keep Doing What Worked: Behavioral Modelling Priors for Offline Reinforcement Learning19 Feb
  8. 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learning26 Nov

Other references · 36

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  4. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  5. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  6. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
  7. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,546
  8. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,241
  9. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,099
  10. 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 840
  11. 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 782
  12. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 773
24 more
  1. 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 743
  2. 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 734
  3. 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 715
  4. 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 671
  5. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling Problemcited by 644
  6. 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 527
  7. 2019Relay Policy Learning: Solving Long-Horizon Tasks via Imitation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 384
  8. 2019Way Off-Policy Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning of Implicit Human Preferences in Dialogcited by 284
  9. 2020Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectivescited by 274
  10. 2018Distributed Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 269
  11. 2019AlgaeDICE: Policy Gradient from Arbitrary Experiencecited by 188
  12. 2018Understanding the impact of entropy on policy optimizationcited by 176
  13. 2020Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Model-Based Offline Optimizationcited by 120
  14. 2015An Emphatic Approach to the Problem of Off-policy Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 103
  15. 2017Reproducibility of Benchmarked Deep Reinforcement Learning Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 93
  16. 2019BAIL: Best-Action Imitation Learning for Batch Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 91
  17. 2019Diagnosing Bottlenecks in Deep Q-learning Algorithmscited by 73
  18. 2018Pseudo-Rehearsal: Achieving Deep Reinforcement Learning without Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 46
  19. 2019Towards Characterizing Divergence in Deep Q-Learningcited by 43
  20. 2020An Equivalence between Loss Functions and Non-Uniform Sampling in Experience Replaycited by 41
  21. 2019Safe Policy Improvement with an Estimated Baseline Policycited by 17
  22. 2022CADRE: A Cascade Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Vision-based Autonomous Urban Drivingcited by 16
  23. 2017Feature Control as Intrinsic Motivation for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  24. 2022Demystifying Reinforcement Learning in Time-Varying Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2024Strategically Conservative Q-Learning
  3. 2023Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuning
  4. 2026Peng's Q(λ) for Conservative Value Estimation in Offline Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2023Contextual Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025Mildly Conservative Regularized Evaluation for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025BiCQL-ML: A Bi-Level Conservative Q-Learning Framework for Maximum Likelihood Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2025Behavior-Adaptive Q-Learning: A Unifying Framework for Offline-to-Online RL