mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Privacy-Preserving Properties of Spiking Neural Networks with Unique Surrogate Gradients and Quantization Levels

arXiv 2502.18623 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.NEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning models increasingly process sensitive data, understanding their vulnerability to privacy attacks is vital. Membership inference attacks (MIAs) exploit model responses to infer whether specific data points were used during training, posing a significant privacy risk. Prior research suggests that spiking neural networks (SNNs), which rely on event-driven computation and discrete spike-based encoding, exhibit greater resilience to MIAs than artificial neural networks (ANNs). This resilience stems from their non-differentiable activations and inherent stochasticity, which obscure the correlation between model responses and individual training samples. To enhance privacy in SNNs, we explore two techniques: quantization and surrogate gradients. Quantization, which reduces precision to limit information leakage, has improved privacy in ANNs. Given SNNs' sparse and irregular activations, quantization may further disrupt the activation patterns exploited by MIAs. We assess the vulnerability of SNNs and ANNs under weight and activation quantization across multiple datasets, using the attack model's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve area under the curve (AUC) metric, where lower values indicate stronger privacy, and evaluate the privacy-accuracy trade-off. Our findings show that quantization enhances privacy in both architectures with minimal performance loss, though full-precision SNNs remain more resilient than quantized ANNs. Additionally, we examine the impact of surrogate gradients on privacy in SNNs. Among five evaluated gradients, spike rate escape provides the best privacy-accuracy trade-off, while arctangent increases vulnerability to MIAs. These results reinforce SNNs' inherent privacy advantages and demonstrate that quantization and surrogate gradient selection significantly influence privacy-accuracy trade-offs in SNNs.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2025.

Builds on

22 of 45 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  3. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
  4. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 498
  5. 2021Training Spiking Neural Networks Using Lessons From Deep Learningcited by 259
  6. 2019Quantization Networkscited by 153
  7. 2022Training High-Performance Low-Latency Spiking Neural Networks by Differentiation on Spike Representationcited by 89
  8. 2018A Survey on Methods and Theories of Quantized Neural Networkscited by 75
  9. 2020When Machine Learning Meets Privacy: A Survey and Outlookcited by 68
  10. 2020An Overview of Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 39
  11. 2021Q-SpiNN: A Framework for Quantizing Spiking Neural Networkscited by 37
  12. 2021PrivateSNN: Privacy-Preserving Spiking Neural Networkscited by 15
10 more
  1. 2024Q-SNNs: Quantized Spiking Neural Networkscited by 12
  2. 2023MINT: Multiplier-less INTeger Quantization for Energy Efficient Spiking Neural Networkscited by 10
  3. 2024BrainLeaks: On the Privacy-Preserving Properties of Neuromorphic Architectures against Model Inversion Attackscited by 7
  4. 2024The Effect of Quantization in Federated Learning: A R'enyi Differential Privacy Perspectivecited by 6
  5. 2023Towards Efficient In-memory Computing Hardware for Quantized Neural Networks: State-of-the-art, Open Challenges and Perspectivescited by 5
  6. 2024Are Neuromorphic Architectures Inherently Privacy-preserving? An Exploratory Studycited by 5
  7. 2019Stochasticity and Robustness in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 3
  8. 2022DPSNN: A Differentially Private Spiking Neural Network with Temporal Enhanced Poolingcited by 1
  9. 2023The Hardware Impact of Quantization and Pruning for Weights in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 1
  10. 2023Security and Privacy Challenges in Deep Learning Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025On the Privacy Risks of Spiking Neural Networks: A Membership Inference Analysis
  2. 2024Membership Privacy Evaluation in Deep Spiking Neural Networks
  3. 2021On the Privacy Risks of Deploying Recurrent Neural Networks in Machine Learning Models
  4. 2024Impact of Dataset Properties on Membership Inference Vulnerability of Deep Transfer Learning
  5. 2026Learnability and Privacy Vulnerability are Entangled in a Few Critical Weights
  6. 2025Modeling Neural Networks with Privacy Using Neural Stochastic Differential Equations
  7. 2025Evaluating the Dynamics of Membership Privacy in Deep Learning
  8. 2022Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Neural Network Pruning