mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AttackPilot: Autonomous Inference Attacks Against ML Services With LLM-Based Agents

arXiv 2511.19536 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Inference attacks have been widely studied and offer a systematic risk assessment of ML services; however, their implementation and the attack parameters for optimal estimation are challenging for non-experts. The emergence of advanced large language models presents a promising yet largely unexplored opportunity to develop autonomous agents as inference attack experts, helping address this challenge. In this paper, we propose AttackPilot, an autonomous agent capable of independently conducting inference attacks without human intervention. We evaluate it on 20 target services. The evaluation shows that our agent, using GPT-4o, achieves a 100.0% task completion rate and near-expert attack performance, with an average token cost of only 0.627 per run. The agent can also be powered by many other representative LLMs and can adaptively optimize its strategy under service constraints. We further perform trace analysis, demonstrating that design choices, such as a multi-agent framework and task-specific action spaces, effectively mitigate errors such as bad plans, inability to follow instructions, task context loss, and hallucinations. We anticipate that such agents could empower non-expert ML service providers, auditors, or regulators to systematically assess the risks of ML services without requiring deep domain expertise.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 44 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2025.

Builds on

44 of 59 references.

References · 44

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  5. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  7. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
  8. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  9. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
  10. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  11. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
  12. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
32 more
  1. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,195
  2. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  3. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
  4. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
  5. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 498
  6. 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 452
  7. 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
  8. 2019Dreaming to Distill: Data-free Knowledge Transfer via DeepInversioncited by 423
  9. 2024Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agentscited by 421
  10. 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 388
  11. 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 366
  12. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 364
  13. 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 292
  14. 2021Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 248
  15. 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repaircited by 232
  16. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 214
  17. 2020Information Leakage in Embedding Modelscited by 203
  18. 2024Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Surveycited by 178
  19. 2020Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposurescited by 168
  20. 2020A Survey of Privacy Attacks in Machine Learningcited by 146
  21. 2019Thieves on Sesame Street! Model Extraction of BERT-based APIscited by 139
  22. 2022Membership Inference Attacks by Exploiting Loss Trajectorycited by 101
  23. 2021ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 85
  24. 2019Overlearning Reveals Sensitive Attributescited by 76
  25. 2020Cryptanalytic Extraction of Neural Network Modelscited by 68
  26. 2019Let's Agree to Agree: Neural Networks Share Classification Order on Real Datasetscited by 56
  27. 2024Spider2-V: How Far Are Multimodal Agents From Automating Data Science and Engineering Workflows?cited by 56
  28. 2020An Overview of Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 39
  29. 2022Imperceptible Backdoor Attack: From Input Space to Feature Representationcited by 27
  30. 2023Maatphor: Automated Variant Analysis for Prompt Injection Attackscited by 14
  31. 2023SoK: Unintended Interactions among Machine Learning Defenses and Riskscited by 6
  32. 2024Understanding Data Importance in Machine Learning Attacks: Does Valuable Data Pose Greater Harm?cited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Dark Side of LLMs: Agent-based Attack Vectors for System-level Compromise
  2. 2026The Landscape of Prompt Injection Threats in LLM Agents: From Taxonomy to Analysis
  3. 2024AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents
  4. 2025SIEVE: Selective Integrity Verification and Escalation for Defending LLM Agents against Indirect Prompt Injection
  5. 2025AgentVigil: Generic Black-Box Red-teaming for Indirect Prompt Injection against LLM Agents
  6. 2026ARGUS: Defending LLM Agents Against Context-Aware Prompt Injection
  7. 2025Commercial LLM Agents Are Already Vulnerable to Simple Yet Dangerous Attacks
  8. 2026Architecting Secure AI Agents: Perspectives on System-Level Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks