L2C: Describing Visual Differences Needs Semantic Understanding of Individuals
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in language and vision push forward the research of captioning a single image to describing visual differences between image pairs. Suppose there are two images, I_1 and I_2, and the task is to generate a description W_{1,2} comparing them, existing methods directly model { I_1, I_2 } -> W_{1,2} mapping without the semantic understanding of individuals. In this paper, we introduce a Learning-to-Compare (L2C) model, which learns to understand the semantic structures of these two images and compare them while learning to describe each one. We demonstrate that L2C benefits from a comparison between explicit semantic representations and single-image captions, and generalizes better on the new testing image pairs. It outperforms the baseline on both automatic evaluation and human evaluation for the Birds-to-Words dataset.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2021.
Builds on
12 of 20 references.
References · 12
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
- 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
- 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
- 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
- 2018Learning to Describe Differences Between Pairs of Similar Imagescited by 114
- 2019Expressing Visual Relationships via Languagecited by 49
- 2018No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual Storytellingcited by 46
- 2020Diagnosing the Environment Bias in Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 41
- 2018Iterative Visual Reasoning Beyond Convolutionscited by 38
- 2019Neural Naturalist: Generating Fine-Grained Image Comparisonscited by 36
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
8 papers.
- 2023Learning Concise and Descriptive Attributes for Visual Recognitioncited by 73
- 2022Image Difference Captioning with Pre-training and Contrastive Learningcited by 39
- 2022Personalized Showcases: Generating Multi-Modal Explanations for Recommendationscited by 30
- 2022Image Retrieval from Contextual Descriptionscited by 26
- 2024OneDiff: A Generalist Model for Image Difference Captioningcited by 15
- 2022Rethinking the Reference-based Distinctive Image Captioningcited by 8
- 2023Improving Reference-based Distinctive Image Captioning with Contrastive Rewardscited by 4
- 2024TAB: Transformer Attention Bottlenecks enable User Intervention and Debugging in Vision-Language Modelscited by 2
- 2024TAB: Transformer Attention Bottlenecks enable User Intervention and Debugging in Vision-Language Models24 Dec 2024
- 2024OneDiff: A Generalist Model for Image Difference Captioning8 Jul 2024
- 2023Learning Concise and Descriptive Attributes for Visual Recognition7 Aug 2023
- 2023Improving Reference-based Distinctive Image Captioning with Contrastive Rewards25 Jun 2023
- 2022Rethinking the Reference-based Distinctive Image Captioning22 Jul 2022
- 2022Personalized Showcases: Generating Multi-Modal Explanations for Recommendations30 Jun 2022
- 2022Image Retrieval from Contextual Descriptions29 Mar 2022
- 2022Image Difference Captioning with Pre-training and Contrastive Learning9 Feb 2022