mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Training Deep Networks

arXiv 2106.03831 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.CL stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although deep learning models have driven state-of-the-art performance on a wide array of tasks, they are prone to spurious correlations that should not be learned as predictive clues. To mitigate this problem, we propose a causality-based training framework to reduce the spurious correlations caused by observed confounders. We give theoretical analysis on the underlying general Structural Causal Model (SCM) and propose to perform Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) on the interventional distribution instead of the observational distribution, namely Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation (CMLE). As the interventional distribution, in general, is hidden from the observational data, we then derive two different upper bounds of the expected negative log-likelihood and propose two general algorithms, Implicit CMLE and Explicit CMLE, for causal predictions of deep learning models using observational data. We conduct experiments on both simulated data and two real-world tasks: Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Image Captioning. The results show that CMLE methods outperform the regular MLE method in terms of out-of-domain generalization performance and reducing spurious correlations, while maintaining comparable performance on the regular evaluations.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2021.

Builds on

52 of 71 references.

References · 52

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  7. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  8. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  9. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  10. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  11. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  12. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
38 more
  1. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  2. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
  3. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  4. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  5. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  6. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  7. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
  8. 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 661
  9. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
  10. 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 533
  11. 2015A Neural Algorithm of Artistic Stylecited by 480
  12. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
  13. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 395
  14. 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 327
  15. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
  16. 2017Toward Controlled Generation of Textcited by 271
  17. 2016Image Captioning with Semantic Attentioncited by 260
  18. 2013Fast Computation of Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 216
  19. 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 210
  20. 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
  21. 2017Bayesian Inference of Individualized Treatment Effects using Multi-task Gaussian Processescited by 156
  22. 2020Can Autonomous Vehicles Identify, Recover From, and Adapt to Distribution Shifts?cited by 139
  23. 2020Invariant Rationalizationcited by 131
  24. 2020A Distributional Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 117
  25. 2019It's All in the Name: Mitigating Gender Bias with Name-Based Counterfactual Data Substitutioncited by 102
  26. 2020Counterfactual Data Augmentation using Locally Factored Dynamicscited by 93
  27. 2017Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularitiescited by 87
  28. 2018How Much Reading Does Reading Comprehension Require? A Critical Investigation of Popular Benchmarkscited by 86
  29. 2020Politeness Transfer: A Tag and Generate Approachcited by 78
  30. 2019Discrete Flows: Invertible Generative Models of Discrete Datacited by 68
  31. 2018Discriminability objective for training descriptive captionscited by 67
  32. 2020Learning What Makes a Difference from Counterfactual Examples and Gradient Supervisioncited by 66
  33. 2020Explaining The Efficacy of Counterfactually Augmented Datacited by 64
  34. 2020Robustness to Spurious Correlations via Human Annotationscited by 62
  35. 2020Diagnosing the Environment Bias in Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 41
  36. 2021Human-like Controllable Image Captioning with Verb-specific Semantic Rolescited by 41
  37. 2020Causal Effects of Linguistic Propertiescited by 39
  38. 2020Length-Controllable Image Captioningcited by 36

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.

5 papers.