mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improved Natural Language Generation via Loss Truncation

arXiv 2004.14589 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2020cs.CL cs.LGcited by 75

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural language models are usually trained to match the distributional properties of a large-scale corpus by minimizing the log loss. While straightforward to optimize, this approach forces the model to reproduce all variations in the dataset, including noisy and invalid references (e.g., misannotation and hallucinated facts). Worse, the commonly used log loss is overly sensitive to such phenomena and even a small fraction of noisy data can degrade performance. In this work, we show that the distinguishability of the models and reference serves as a principled and robust alternative for handling invalid references. To optimize distinguishability, we propose loss truncation, which adaptively removes high loss examples during training. We show this is as easy to optimize as log loss and tightly bounds distinguishability under noise. Empirically, we demonstrate that loss truncation outperforms existing baselines on distinguishability on a summarization task, and show that samples generated by the loss truncation model have factual accuracy ratings that exceed those of baselines and match human references.

Key facts. Cited by 75 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 17; 2022: 21; 2023: 17; 2024: 13; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

75 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  2. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 444
  3. 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 319
  4. 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
  5. 2022On the Origin of Hallucinations in Conversational Models: Is it the Datasets or the Models?cited by 137
  6. 2021Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarizationcited by 131
  7. 2021Hallucinated but Factual! Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 128
  8. 2024Language Models with Conformal Factuality Guaranteescited by 128
  9. 2022Truncation Sampling as Language Model Desmoothingcited by 121
  10. 2022FaithDial: A Faithful Benchmark for Information-Seeking Dialoguecited by 108
  11. 2022Evaluating Human-Language Model Interactioncited by 90
  12. 2023Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 83
38 more
  1. 2021Language Model Evaluation Beyond Perplexitycited by 77
  2. 2021Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selectioncited by 75
  3. 2021Evaluating Attribution in Dialogue Systems: The BEGIN Benchmarkcited by 75
  4. 2023Mitigating Large Language Model Hallucinations via Autonomous Knowledge Graph-based Retrofittingcited by 70
  5. 2022Mutual Information Alleviates Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 67
  6. 2020Text Generation by Learning from Demonstrationscited by 64
  7. 2021Order-Agnostic Cross Entropy for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 57
  8. 2021Faithful or Extractive? On Mitigating the Faithfulness-Abstractiveness Trade-off in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 50
  9. 2022FactPEGASUS: Factuality-Aware Pre-training and Fine-tuning for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 49
  10. 2023Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Multilingual Summarisationcited by 48
  11. 2025Large Language Models Hallucination: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 45
  12. 2022mFACE: Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluationcited by 42
  13. 2022Contrastive Learning Reduces Hallucination in Conversationscited by 39
  14. 2024AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth Clarifyingcited by 34
  15. 2023Inference-Time Policy Adapters (IPA): Tailoring Extreme-Scale LMs without Fine-tuningcited by 33
  16. 2021Relation Classification with Entity Type Restrictioncited by 31
  17. 2023Elastic Weight Removal for Faithful and Abstractive Dialogue Generationcited by 29
  18. 2022Learning to Revise References for Faithful Summarizationcited by 28
  19. 2022Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methodscited by 27
  20. 2023Tailoring Language Generation Models under Total Variation Distancecited by 27
  21. 2021Training Dynamics for Text Summarization Modelscited by 25
  22. 2022Beyond Counting Datasets: A Survey of Multilingual Dataset Construction and Necessary Resourcescited by 25
  23. 2024Deductive Closure Training of Language Models for Coherence, Accuracy, and Updatabilitycited by 22
  24. 2023Zero-shot Faithfulness Evaluation for Text Summarization with Foundation Language Modelcited by 21
  25. 2022Faithful to the Document or to the World? Mitigating Hallucinations via Entity-linked Knowledge in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 20
  26. 2021Don't Take It Literally: An Edit-Invariant Sequence Loss for Text Generationcited by 17
  27. 2023On the Efficacy of Sampling Adapterscited by 17
  28. 2023MixCE: Training Autoregressive Language Models by Mixing Forward and Reverse Cross-Entropiescited by 16
  29. 2024Know the Unknown: An Uncertainty-Sensitive Method for LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 16
  30. 2022Shortcomings of Question Answering Based Factuality Frameworks for Error Localizationcited by 15
  31. 2022Improving Factual Consistency in Summarization with Compression-Based Post-Editingcited by 13
  32. 2022Contrastive Error Attribution for Finetuned Language Modelscited by 12
  33. 2021Truth-Conditional Captioning of Time Series Datacited by 11
  34. 2021CaPE: Contrastive Parameter Ensembling for Reducing Hallucination in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 11
  35. 2024Mitigating Memorization In Language Modelscited by 11
  36. 2022Improved Beam Search for Hallucination Mitigation in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 10
  37. 2023Chunk, Align, Select: A Simple Long-sequence Processing Method for Transformerscited by 9
  38. 2022ngram-OAXE: Phrase-Based Order-Agnostic Cross Entropy for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 8

50 most cited of 75 All 75 (JSON)