CaPE: Contrastive Parameter Ensembling for Reducing Hallucination in Abstractive Summarization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hallucination is a known issue for neural abstractive summarization models. Recent work suggests that the degree of hallucination may depend on errors in the training data. In this work, we propose a new method called Contrastive Parameter Ensembling (CaPE) to use training data more effectively, utilizing variations in noise in training samples to reduce hallucination. We first select clean and noisy subsets from the training data using different automatic factual metrics. Then, we fine-tune a base summarization model, which is trained on all training samples, on the clean (noisy) subset to obtain an textitexpert (textitanti-expert) model. Finally, we adjust the parameters of base model by the difference between parameters of the textitexpert and textitanti-expert models, steering the base model towards the textitexpert model and away from the textitanti-expert model. Experimental results show that CaPE improves performance across different automatic factual metrics and human evaluation, with the maximum improvement of 16.69% and 15.78% on summary-level dependency-arc entailment accuracy for the XSUM and CNN/DM datasets. The improvement in factual performance does not degrade the performance on other metrics of informativeness such as ROUGE.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2021.
Builds on
44 of 59 references.
References · 44
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
- 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
- 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
32 more
- 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
- 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 578
- 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 434
- 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 377
- 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
- 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 365
- 2020FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 292
- 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 285
- 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 241
- 2020Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generationcited by 151
- 2020NeuroLogic Decoding: (Un)supervised Neural Text Generation with Predicate Logic Constraintscited by 146
- 2021Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarizationcited by 131
- 2021Hallucinated but Factual! Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 128
- 2020Evaluating Factuality in Generation with Dependency-level Entailmentcited by 122
- 2021CLIFF: Contrastive Learning for Improving Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 120
- 2021Entity-level Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 118
- 2020Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Modelscited by 108
- 2019Answers Unite! Unsupervised Metrics for Reinforced Summarization Modelscited by 92
- 2020Controlled Hallucinations: Learning to Generate Faithfully from Noisy Datacited by 83
- 2016Edinburgh Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT 16cited by 76
- 2020Improved Natural Language Generation via Loss Truncationcited by 75
- 2020GO FIGURE: A Meta Evaluation of Factuality in Summarizationcited by 75
- 2021Planning with Learned Entity Prompts for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 75
- 2021Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selectioncited by 75
- 2020Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 66
- 2019Question Answering as an Automatic Evaluation Metric for News Article Summarizationcited by 63
- 2021Focus Attention: Promoting Faithfulness and Diversity in Summarizationcited by 30
- 2020Constrained Abstractive Summarization: Preserving Factual Consistency with Constrained Generationcited by 26
- 2020Improving Truthfulness of Headline Generationcited by 20
- 2021How well do you know your summarization datasets?cited by 16
- 2020Attention over Parameters for Dialogue Systemscited by 14
- 2021Improving Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization on Customer Feedbackcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 2.
11 papers.
- 2023Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Multilingual Summarisationcited by 48
- 2023Elastic Weight Removal for Faithful and Abstractive Dialogue Generationcited by 29
- 2025Steering Language Models with Weight Arithmeticcited by 19
- 2024An Audit on the Perspectives and Challenges of Hallucinations in NLPcited by 17
- 2023Investigating Hallucinations in Pruned Large Language Models for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 16
- 2024On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directionscited by 3
- 2024On the Benefits of Fine-Grained Loss Truncation: A Case Study on Factuality in Summarizationcited by 2
- 2024Improving Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization via Data Distillation and Conditional-generation Clozecited by 0
- 2024Detecting Response Generation Not Requiring Factual Judgmentcited by 0
- 2024Leveraging Entailment Judgements in Cross-Lingual Summarisationcited by 0
- 2025The Impact of Negated Text on Hallucination with Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2025Steering Language Models with Weight Arithmetic7 Nov 2025
- 2025The Impact of Negated Text on Hallucination with Large Language Models23 Oct 2025
- 2024Leveraging Entailment Judgements in Cross-Lingual Summarisation1 Aug 2024
- 2024On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directions16 Jun 2024
- 2024Detecting Response Generation Not Requiring Factual Judgment14 Jun 2024
- 2024An Audit on the Perspectives and Challenges of Hallucinations in NLP11 Apr 2024
- 2024On the Benefits of Fine-Grained Loss Truncation: A Case Study on Factuality in Summarization9 Mar 2024
- 2024Improving Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization via Data Distillation and Conditional-generation Cloze13 Feb 2024
- 2023Investigating Hallucinations in Pruned Large Language Models for Abstractive Summarization15 Nov 2023
- 2023Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Multilingual Summarisation23 May 2023
- 2023Elastic Weight Removal for Faithful and Abstractive Dialogue Generation30 Mar 2023