mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SCURank: Ranking Multiple Candidate Summaries with Summary Content Units for Enhanced Summarization

arXiv 2604.19185 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Small language models (SLMs), such as BART, can achieve summarization performance comparable to large language models (LLMs) via distillation. However, existing LLM-based ranking strategies for summary candidates suffer from instability, while classical metrics (e.g., ROUGE) are insufficient to rank high-quality summaries. To address these issues, we introduce SCURank, a framework that enhances summarization by leveraging Summary Content Units (SCUs). Instead of relying on unstable comparisons or surface-level overlap, SCURank evaluates summaries based on the richness and semantic importance of information content. We investigate the effectiveness of SCURank in distilling summaries from multiple diverse LLMs. Experimental results demonstrate that SCURank outperforms traditional metrics and LLM-based ranking methods across evaluation measures and datasets. Furthermore, our findings show that incorporating diverse LLM summaries enhances model abstractiveness and overall distilled model performance, validating the benefits of information-centric ranking in multi-LLM distillation. The code for SCURank is available at https://github.com/IKMLab/SCURank.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.

Builds on

25 of 37 references.

References · 25

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  6. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  7. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  8. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  9. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  10. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 812
  11. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 737
  12. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
13 more
  1. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 445
  2. 2018Newsroom: A Dataset of 1.3 Million Summaries with Diverse Extractive Strategiescited by 294
  3. 2022BRIO: Bringing Order to Abstractive Summarizationcited by 161
  4. 2020Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarizationcited by 145
  5. 2021SimCLS: A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Abstractive Summarizationcited by 132
  6. 2020Fill in the BLANC: Human-free quality estimation of document summariescited by 82
  7. 2023On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as Referencescited by 80
  8. 2020Improved Natural Language Generation via Loss Truncationcited by 75
  9. 2021Finding a Balanced Degree of Automation for Summary Evaluationcited by 43
  10. 2019Crowdsourcing Lightweight Pyramids for Manual Summary Evaluationcited by 39
  11. 2016Revisiting Summarization Evaluation for Scientific Articlescited by 31
  12. 2024TriSum: Learning Summarization Ability from Large Language Models with Structured Rationalecited by 10
  13. 2024On the Role of Summary Content Units in Text Summarization Evaluationcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.