mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Error Norm Truncation: Robust Training in the Presence of Data Noise for Text Generation Models

arXiv 2310.00840 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text generation models are notoriously vulnerable to errors in the training data. With the wide-spread availability of massive amounts of web-crawled data becoming more commonplace, how can we enhance the robustness of models trained on a massive amount of noisy web-crawled text? In our work, we propose Error Norm Truncation (ENT), a robust enhancement method to the standard training objective that truncates noisy data. Compared to methods that only uses the negative log-likelihood loss to estimate data quality, our method provides a more accurate estimation by considering the distribution of non-target tokens, which is often overlooked by previous work. Through comprehensive experiments across language modeling, machine translation, and text summarization, we show that equipping text generation models with ENT improves generation quality over standard training and previous soft and hard truncation methods. Furthermore, we show that our method improves the robustness of models against two of the most detrimental types of noise in machine translation, resulting in an increase of more than 2 BLEU points over the MLE baseline when up to 50% of noise is added to the data.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2023.

Builds on

54 of 77 references.

References · 54

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  6. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  7. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  8. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  9. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  10. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  11. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
  12. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
38 more
  1. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
  2. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  3. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
  4. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
  5. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
  6. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 489
  7. 2015A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarizationcited by 394
  8. 2021XL-Sum: Large-Scale Multilingual Abstractive Summarization for 44 Languagescited by 346
  9. 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 311
  10. 2020Improving Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation and Zero-Shot Translationcited by 277
  11. 2022Generating Sequences by Learning to Self-Correctcited by 271
  12. 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 254
  13. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
  14. 2020Nearest Neighbor Machine Translationcited by 209
  15. 2019Competence-based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 201
  16. 2020Gradient Vaccine: Investigating and Improving Multi-task Optimization in Massively Multilingual Modelscited by 167
  17. 2019On the Accuracy of Influence Functions for Measuring Group Effectscited by 146
  18. 2020Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functionscited by 144
  19. 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 132
  20. 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
  21. 2022Measuring Forgetting of Memorized Training Examplescited by 118
  22. 2020Tilted Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 103
  23. 2020Characterizing Structural Regularities of Labeled Data in Overparameterized Modelscited by 93
  24. 2022Learning to Break the Loop: Analyzing and Mitigating Repetitions for Neural Text Generationcited by 90
  25. 2018On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translationcited by 76
  26. 2020Improved Natural Language Generation via Loss Truncationcited by 75
  27. 2020Balancing Training for Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
  28. 2020Text Generation by Learning from Demonstrationscited by 64
  29. 2019Curriculum Learning for Domain Adaptation in Neural Machine Translationcited by 59
  30. 2019Optimizing Data Usage via Differentiable Rewardscited by 48
  31. 2021Improving Multilingual Translation by Representation and Gradient Regularizationcited by 31
  32. 2021Influence Tuning: Demoting Spurious Correlations via Instance Attribution and Instance-Driven Updatescited by 27
  33. 2023Tailoring Language Generation Models under Total Variation Distancecited by 27
  34. 2021Training Dynamics for Text Summarization Modelscited by 25
  35. 2020Simulated Multiple Reference Training Improves Low-Resource Machine Translationcited by 22
  36. 2022CoNT: Contrastive Neural Text Generationcited by 21
  37. 2021Straight to the Gradient: Learning to Use Novel Tokens for Neural Text Generationcited by 19
  38. 2021Putting words into the system's mouth: A targeted attack on neural machine translation using monolingual data poisoningcited by 19

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.