mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptive Offline Quintuplet Loss for Image-Text Matching

arXiv 2003.03669 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2020cs.CVcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing image-text matching approaches typically leverage triplet loss with online hard negatives to train the model. For each image or text anchor in a training mini-batch, the model is trained to distinguish between a positive and the most confusing negative of the anchor mined from the mini-batch (i.e. online hard negative). This strategy improves the model's capacity to discover fine-grained correspondences and non-correspondences between image and text inputs. However, the above approach has the following drawbacks: (1) the negative selection strategy still provides limited chances for the model to learn from very hard-to-distinguish cases. (2) The trained model has weak generalization capability from the training set to the testing set. (3) The penalty lacks hierarchy and adaptiveness for hard negatives with different "hardness" degrees. In this paper, we propose solutions by sampling negatives offline from the whole training set. It provides "harder" offline negatives than online hard negatives for the model to distinguish. Based on the offline hard negatives, a quintuplet loss is proposed to improve the model's generalization capability to distinguish positives and negatives. In addition, a novel loss function that combines the knowledge of positives, offline hard negatives and online hard negatives is created. It leverages offline hard negatives as the intermediary to adaptively penalize them based on their distance relations to the anchor. We evaluate the proposed training approach on three state-of-the-art image-text models on the MS-COCO and Flickr30K datasets. Significant performance improvements are observed for all the models, proving the effectiveness and generality of our approach. Code is available at https://github.com/sunnychencool/AOQ

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 8; 2023: 7; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

26 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Probabilistic Embeddings for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 150
  2. 2021Are Gender-Neutral Queries Really Gender-Neutral? Mitigating Gender Bias in Image Searchcited by 90
  3. 2022ECCV Caption: Correcting False Negatives by Collecting Machine-and-Human-verified Image-Caption Associations for MS-COCOcited by 37
  4. 2023Exposing and Mitigating Spurious Correlations for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 35
  5. 2021Iterative Shrinking for Referring Expression Grounding Using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
  6. 2022YORO -- Lightweight End to End Visual Groundingcited by 16
  7. 2022CODER: Coupled Diversity-Sensitive Momentum Contrastive Learning for Image-Text Retrievalcited by 13
  8. 2023USER: Unified Semantic Enhancement with Momentum Contrast for Image-Text Retrievalcited by 13
  9. 2021Telling the What while Pointing to the Where: Multimodal Queries for Image Retrievalcited by 12
  10. 2023Your Negative May not Be True Negative: Boosting Image-Text Matching with False Negative Eliminationcited by 10
  11. 2022Auxiliary Cross-Modal Representation Learning with Triplet Loss Functions for Online Handwriting Recognitioncited by 6
  12. 2021More Than Just Attention: Improving Cross-Modal Attentions with Contrastive Constraints for Image-Text Matchingcited by 5
14 more
  1. 2024Deep Boosting Learning: A Brand-new Cooperative Approach for Image-Text Matchingcited by 4
  2. 2024GSSF: Generalized Structural Sparse Function for Deep Cross-modal Metric Learningcited by 4
  3. 2022Do Lessons from Metric Learning Generalize to Image-Caption Retrieval?cited by 3
  4. 2022Reducing Predictive Feature Suppression in Resource-Constrained Contrastive Image-Caption Retrievalcited by 3
  5. 2023Dynamic Visual Semantic Sub-Embeddings and Fast Re-Rankingcited by 3
  6. 2021Negative Sample is Negative in Its Own Way: Tailoring Negative Sentences for Image-Text Retrievalcited by 2
  7. 2023Selectively Hard Negative Mining for Alleviating Gradient Vanishing in Image-Text Matchingcited by 2
  8. 2025Composed Multi-modal Retrieval: A Survey of Approaches and Applicationscited by 2
  9. 2022Unified Loss of Pair Similarity Optimization for Vision-Language Retrievalcited by 1
  10. 2022Image-Text Retrieval with Binary and Continuous Label Supervisioncited by 1
  11. 2026HNC: Leveraging Hard Negative Captions towards Models with Fine-Grained Visual-Linguistic Comprehension Capabilitiescited by 1
  12. 2023Integrating Listwise Ranking into Pairwise-based Image-Text Retrievalcited by 0
  13. 2023Active Mining Sample Pair Semantics for Image-text Matchingcited by 0
  14. 2025Descriptive Image-Text Matching with Graded Contextual Similaritycited by 0