Active Mining Sample Pair Semantics for Image-text Matching
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, commonsense learning has been a hot topic in image-text matching. Although it can describe more graphic correlations, commonsense learning still has some shortcomings: 1) The existing methods are based on triplet semantic similarity measurement loss, which cannot effectively match the intractable negative in image-text sample pairs. 2) The weak generalization ability of the model leads to the poor effect of image and text matching on large-scale datasets. According to these shortcomings. This paper proposes a novel image-text matching model, called Active Mining Sample Pair Semantics image-text matching model (AMSPS). Compared with the single semantic learning mode of the commonsense learning model with triplet loss function, AMSPS is an active learning idea. Firstly, the proposed Adaptive Hierarchical Reinforcement Loss (AHRL) has diversified learning modes. Its active learning mode enables the model to more focus on the intractable negative samples to enhance the discriminating ability. In addition, AMSPS can also adaptively mine more hidden relevant semantic representations from uncommented items, which greatly improves the performance and generalization ability of the model. Experimental results on Flickr30K and MSCOCO universal datasets show that our proposed method is superior to advanced comparison methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2023.
Builds on
22 of 34 references.
References · 22
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
- 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
- 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
- 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 414
- 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
- 2022Superpoint Transformer for 3D Scene Instance Segmentationcited by 115
- 2016Dual Attention Networks for Multimodal Reasoning and Matchingcited by 113
10 more
- 2019CAMP: Cross-Modal Adaptive Message Passing for Text-Image Retrievalcited by 110
- 2017Deep Metric Learning with Angular Losscited by 107
- 2020Graph Structured Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 93
- 2017Learning Semantic Concepts and Order for Image and Sentence Matchingcited by 61
- 2020Consensus-Aware Visual-Semantic Embedding for Image-Text Matchingcited by 59
- 2019Focus Your Attention: A Bidirectional Focal Attention Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 49
- 2020Adaptive Offline Quintuplet Loss for Image-Text Matchingcited by 26
- 2016Linking Image and Text with 2-Way Netscited by 14
- 2021Is An Image Worth Five Sentences? A New Look into Semantics for Image-Text Matchingcited by 13
- 2019Target-Oriented Deformation of Visual-Semantic Embedding Spacecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.