mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dynamic Visual Semantic Sub-Embeddings and Fast Re-Ranking

arXiv 2309.08154 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2023cs.CV cs.IRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The core of cross-modal matching is to accurately measure the similarity between different modalities in a unified representation space. However, compared to textual descriptions of a certain perspective, the visual modality has more semantic variations. So, images are usually associated with multiple textual captions in databases. Although popular symmetric embedding methods have explored numerous modal interaction approaches, they often learn toward increasing the average expression probability of multiple semantic variations within image embeddings. Consequently, information entropy in embeddings is increased, resulting in redundancy and decreased accuracy. In this work, we propose a Dynamic Visual Semantic Sub-Embeddings framework (DVSE) to reduce the information entropy. Specifically, we obtain a set of heterogeneous visual sub-embeddings through dynamic orthogonal constraint loss. To encourage the generated candidate embeddings to capture various semantic variations, we construct a mixed distribution and employ a variance-aware weighting loss to assign different weights to the optimization process. In addition, we develop a Fast Re-ranking strategy (FR) to efficiently evaluate the retrieval results and enhance the performance. We compare the performance with existing set-based method using four image feature encoders and two text feature encoders on three benchmark datasets: MSCOCO, Flickr30K and CUB Captions. We also show the role of different components by ablation studies and perform a sensitivity analysis of the hyperparameters. The qualitative analysis of visualized bidirectional retrieval and attention maps further demonstrates the ability of our method to encode semantic variations.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2023.

Builds on

49 of 84 references.

References · 49

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  7. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  8. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  9. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  10. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  11. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  12. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
37 more
  1. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
  2. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  3. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,345
  4. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  5. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
  6. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  7. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 604
  8. 2017Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotationcited by 497
  9. 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 414
  10. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 397
  11. 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
  12. 2017Re-ranking Person Re-identification with k-reciprocal Encodingcited by 260
  13. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- The Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 254
  14. 2014Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Modelscited by 197
  15. 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
  16. 2021Probabilistic Embeddings for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 150
  17. 2017Dual-Path Convolutional Image-Text Embeddings with Instance Losscited by 145
  18. 2020Learning the Best Pooling Strategy for Visual Semantic Embeddingcited by 136
  19. 2021Similarity Reasoning and Filtration for Image-Text Matchingcited by 121
  20. 2016Show and Tell: Lessons learned from the 2015 MSCOCO Image Captioning Challengecited by 116
  21. 2020IMRAM: Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrievalcited by 115
  22. 2014Deep Fragment Embeddings for Bidirectional Image Sentence Mappingcited by 99
  23. 2020Graph Structured Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 93
  24. 2019Polysemous Visual-Semantic Embedding for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 83
  25. 2019Cross-modal Scene Graph Matching for Relationship-aware Image-Text Retrievalcited by 66
  26. 2021Instance-level Image Retrieval using Reranking Transformerscited by 63
  27. 2017Learning Semantic Concepts and Order for Image and Sentence Matchingcited by 61
  28. 2022Composed Image Retrieval with Text Feedback via Multi-grained Uncertainty Regularizationcited by 45
  29. 2022MAP: Multimodal Uncertainty-Aware Vision-Language Pre-training Modelcited by 41
  30. 2022Remote Sensing Cross-Modal Text-Image Retrieval Based on Global and Local Informationcited by 40
  31. 2023Target-Guided Composed Image Retrievalcited by 36
  32. 2022Improving Cross-Modal Retrieval with Set of Diverse Embeddingscited by 33
  33. 2020Adaptive Offline Quintuplet Loss for Image-Text Matchingcited by 26
  34. 2020Understanding Image Retrieval Re-Ranking: A Graph Neural Network Perspectivecited by 24
  35. 2019Matching Images and Text with Multi-modal Tensor Fusion and Re-rankingcited by 20
  36. 2020Dual Attention on Pyramid Feature Maps for Image Captioningcited by 11
  37. 2023Learnable Pillar-based Re-ranking for Image-Text Retrievalcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.