mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Image-Text Retrieval with Binary and Continuous Label Supervision

arXiv 2210.11319 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2022cs.CV cs.MMcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most image-text retrieval work adopts binary labels indicating whether a pair of image and text matches or not. Such a binary indicator covers only a limited subset of image-text semantic relations, which is insufficient to represent relevance degrees between images and texts described by continuous labels such as image captions. The visual-semantic embedding space obtained by learning binary labels is incoherent and cannot fully characterize the relevance degrees. In addition to the use of binary labels, this paper further incorporates continuous pseudo labels (generally approximated by text similarity between captions) to indicate the relevance degrees. To learn a coherent embedding space, we propose an image-text retrieval framework with Binary and Continuous Label Supervision (BCLS), where binary labels are used to guide the retrieval model to learn limited binary correlations, and continuous labels are complementary to the learning of image-text semantic relations. For the learning of binary labels, we improve the common Triplet ranking loss with Soft Negative mining (Triplet-SN) to improve convergence. For the learning of continuous labels, we design Kendall ranking loss inspired by Kendall rank correlation coefficient (Kendall), which improves the correlation between the similarity scores predicted by the retrieval model and the continuous labels. To mitigate the noise introduced by the continuous pseudo labels, we further design Sliding Window sampling and Hard Sample mining strategy (SW-HS) to alleviate the impact of noise and reduce the complexity of our framework to the same order of magnitude as the triplet ranking loss. Extensive experiments on two image-text retrieval benchmarks demonstrate that our method can improve the performance of state-of-the-art image-text retrieval models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2022.

Builds on

29 of 62 references.

References · 29

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  6. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  7. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
  8. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
  9. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
  10. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
  11. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
  12. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 824
17 more
  1. 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
  2. 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 422
  3. 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 416
  4. 201912-in-1: Multi-Task Vision and Language Representation Learningcited by 278
  5. 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
  6. 2020Learning the Best Pooling Strategy for Visual Semantic Embeddingcited by 137
  7. 2021Similarity Reasoning and Filtration for Image-Text Matchingcited by 121
  8. 2020IMRAM: Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrievalcited by 115
  9. 2020Smooth-AP: Smoothing the Path Towards Large-Scale Image Retrievalcited by 98
  10. 2020Crisscrossed Captions: Extended Intramodal and Intermodal Semantic Similarity Judgments for MS-COCOcited by 46
  11. 2021On Semantic Similarity in Video Retrievalcited by 46
  12. 2022ECCV Caption: Correcting False Negatives by Collecting Machine-and-Human-verified Image-Caption Associations for MS-COCOcited by 37
  13. 2020Universal Weighting Metric Learning for Cross-Modal Matchingcited by 34
  14. 2022ViSTA: Vision and Scene Text Aggregation for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 29
  15. 2020Adaptive Offline Quintuplet Loss for Image-Text Matchingcited by 26
  16. 2019Ladder Loss for Coherent Visual-Semantic Embeddingcited by 15
  17. 2021Is An Image Worth Five Sentences? A New Look into Semantics for Image-Text Matchingcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.