mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unified Loss of Pair Similarity Optimization for Vision-Language Retrieval

arXiv 2209.13869 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2022cs.CV cs.MMcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There are two popular loss functions used for vision-language retrieval, i.e., triplet loss and contrastive learning loss, both of them essentially minimize the difference between the similarities of negative pairs and positive pairs. More specifically, Triplet loss with Hard Negative mining (Triplet-HN), which is widely used in existing retrieval models to improve the discriminative ability, is easy to fall into local minima in training. On the other hand, Vision-Language Contrastive learning loss (VLC), which is widely used in the vision-language pre-training, has been shown to achieve significant performance gains on vision-language retrieval, but the performance of fine-tuning with VLC on small datasets is not satisfactory. This paper proposes a unified loss of pair similarity optimization for vision-language retrieval, providing a powerful tool for understanding existing loss functions. Our unified loss includes the hard sample mining strategy of VLC and introduces the margin used by the triplet loss for better similarity separation. It is shown that both Triplet-HN and VLC are special forms of our unified loss. Compared with the Triplet-HN, our unified loss has a fast convergence speed. Compared with the VLC, our unified loss is more discriminative and can provide better generalization in downstream fine-tuning tasks. Experiments on image-text and video-text retrieval benchmarks show that our unified loss can significantly improve the performance of the state-of-the-art retrieval models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2022.

Builds on

34 of 50 references.

References · 34

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  6. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  7. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
  8. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  9. 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
  10. 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 421
  11. 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 414
  12. 2020Circle Loss: A Unified Perspective of Pair Similarity Optimizationcited by 402
22 more
  1. 2020Multi-modal Transformer for Video Retrievalcited by 395
  2. 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
  3. 2019Use What You Have: Video Retrieval Using Representations From Collaborative Expertscited by 214
  4. 2018A Joint Sequence Fusion Model for Video Question Answering and Retrievalcited by 208
  5. 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
  6. 2020Learning the Best Pooling Strategy for Visual Semantic Embeddingcited by 136
  7. 2022X-Pool: Cross-Modal Language-Video Attention for Text-Video Retrievalcited by 127
  8. 2021Similarity Reasoning and Filtration for Image-Text Matchingcited by 121
  9. 2020IMRAM: Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrievalcited by 115
  10. 2019CAMP: Cross-Modal Adaptive Message Passing for Text-Image Retrievalcited by 110
  11. 2020Graph Structured Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 93
  12. 2018Dual Encoding for Zero-Example Video Retrievalcited by 85
  13. 2021Everything at Once -- Multi-modal Fusion Transformer for Video Retrievalcited by 79
  14. 2022Bridging Video-text Retrieval with Multiple Choice Questionscited by 79
  15. 2020Consensus-Aware Visual-Semantic Embedding for Image-Text Matchingcited by 59
  16. 2021Object-aware Video-language Pre-training for Retrievalcited by 57
  17. 2019Focus Your Attention: A Bidirectional Focal Attention Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 49
  18. 2020Universal Weighting Metric Learning for Cross-Modal Matchingcited by 34
  19. 2022ViSTA: Vision and Scene Text Aggregation for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 29
  20. 2020Adaptive Offline Quintuplet Loss for Image-Text Matchingcited by 26
  21. 2020Expressing Objects just like Words: Recurrent Visual Embedding for Image-Text Matchingcited by 15
  22. 2021Is An Image Worth Five Sentences? A New Look into Semantics for Image-Text Matchingcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023MAFA: Managing False Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-training
  2. 2025ELIP: Enhanced Visual-Language Foundation Models for Image Retrieval
  3. 2022HiVLP: Hierarchical Vision-Language Pre-Training for Fast Image-Text Retrieval
  4. 2025Improve Multi-Modal Embedding Learning via Explicit Hard Negative Gradient Amplifying
  5. 2024RoRA-VLM: Robust Retrieval-Augmented Vision Language Models
  6. 2025PairBench: Are Vision-Language Models Reliable at Comparing What They See?
  7. 2024FFF: Fixing Flawed Foundations in contrastive pre-training results in very strong Vision-Language models
  8. 2022Compressing And Debiasing Vision-Language Pre-Trained Models for Visual Question Answering