Reducing Predictive Feature Suppression in Resource-Constrained Contrastive Image-Caption Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To train image-caption retrieval (ICR) methods, contrastive loss functions are a common choice for optimization functions. Unfortunately, contrastive ICR methods are vulnerable to predictive feature suppression. Predictive features are features that correctly indicate the similarity between a query and a candidate item. However, in the presence of multiple predictive features during training, encoder models tend to suppress redundant predictive features, since these features are not needed to learn to discriminate between positive and negative pairs. While some predictive features are redundant during training, these features might be relevant during evaluation. We introduce an approach to reduce predictive feature suppression for resource-constrained ICR methods: latent target decoding (LTD). We add an additional decoder to the contrastive ICR framework, to reconstruct the input caption in a latent space of a general-purpose sentence encoder, which prevents the image and caption encoder from suppressing predictive features. We implement the LTD objective as an optimization constraint, to ensure that the reconstruction loss is below a bound value while primarily optimizing for the contrastive loss. Importantly, LTD does not depend on additional training data or expensive (hard) negative mining strategies. Our experiments show that, unlike reconstructing the input caption in the input space, LTD reduces predictive feature suppression, measured by obtaining higher recall@k, r-precision, and nDCG scores than a contrastive ICR baseline. Moreover, we show that LTD should be implemented as an optimization constraint instead of a dual optimization objective. Finally, we show that LTD can be used with different contrastive learning losses and a wide variety of resource-constrained ICR methods.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2022.
Builds on
54 of 70 references.
References · 54
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
38 more
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
- 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
- 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
- 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,304
- 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 968
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
- 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
- 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 824
- 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 804
- 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 416
- 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 413
- 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
- 2020What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learningcited by 226
- 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
- 2021Probabilistic Embeddings for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 151
- 2020Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Lossescited by 130
- 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 126
- 2021Similarity Reasoning and Filtration for Image-Text Matchingcited by 121
- 2020IMRAM: Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrievalcited by 115
- 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
- 2019CAMP: Cross-Modal Adaptive Message Passing for Text-Image Retrievalcited by 110
- 2020Smooth-AP: Smoothing the Path Towards Large-Scale Image Retrievalcited by 98
- 2020Graph Structured Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 93
- 2019Cross-modal Scene Graph Matching for Relationship-aware Image-Text Retrievalcited by 66
- 2020Fine-grained Visual Textual Alignment for Cross-Modal Retrieval using Transformer Encoderscited by 47
- 2020Crisscrossed Captions: Extended Intramodal and Intermodal Semantic Similarity Judgments for MS-COCOcited by 46
- 2021Order in the Court: Explainable AI Methods Prone to Disagreementcited by 36
- 2020Adaptive Offline Quintuplet Loss for Image-Text Matchingcited by 26
- 2020Transformer Reasoning Network for Image-Text Matching and Retrievalcited by 19
- 2022Where Does the Performance Improvement Come From? -- A Reproducibility Concern about Image-Text Retrievalcited by 19
50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.
3 papers.