Non-Euclidean Broximal Point Method: A Blueprint for Geometry-Aware Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The recently proposed Broximal Point Method (BPM) [Gruntkowska et al., 2025] offers an idealized optimization framework based on iteratively minimizing the objective function over norm balls centered at the current iterate. It enjoys striking global convergence guarantees, converging linearly and in a finite number of steps for proper, closed and convex functions. However, its theoretical analysis has so far been confined to the Euclidean geometry. At the same time, emerging trends in deep learning optimization, exemplified by algorithms such as Muon [Jordan et al., 2024] and Scion [Pethick et al., 2025], demonstrate the practical advantages of minimizing over balls defined via non-Euclidean norms which better align with the underlying geometry of the associated loss landscapes. In this note, we ask whether the convergence theory of BPM can be extended to this more general, non-Euclidean setting. We give a positive answer, showing that most of the elegant guarantees of the original method carry over to arbitrary norm geometries. Along the way, we clarify which properties are preserved and which necessarily break down when leaving the Euclidean realm. Our analysis positions Non-Euclidean BPM as a conceptual blueprint for understanding a broad class of geometry-aware optimization algorithms, shedding light on the principles behind their practical effectiveness.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.
Builds on
43 of 73 references.
References · 43
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
- 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 561
- 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 526
- 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
- 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 381
- 2019Error Feedback Fixes SignSGD and other Gradient Compression Schemescited by 306
- 2015Coordinate Descent Algorithmscited by 218
- 2025Training Deep Learning Models with Norm-Constrained LMOscited by 177
- 2024Old Optimizer, New Norm: An Anthologycited by 173
- 2017Dissecting Adam: The Sign, Magnitude and Variance of Stochastic Gradientscited by 136
- 2020Momentum Improves Normalized SGDcited by 136
- 2023Noise Is Not the Main Factor Behind the Gap Between SGD and Adam on Transformers, but Sign Descent Might Becited by 114
31 more
- 2023Learning-Rate-Free Learning by D-Adaptationcited by 113
- 2019A Unified Theory of SGD: Variance Reduction, Sampling, Quantization and Coordinate Descentcited by 84
- 2025Understanding Gradient Orthogonalization for Deep Learning via Non-Euclidean Trust-Region Optimizationcited by 81
- 2025A Note on the Convergence of Muoncited by 78
- 2015Beyond Convexity: Stochastic Quasi-Convex Optimizationcited by 75
- 2025Practical Efficiency of Muon for Pretrainingcited by 74
- 2025Gluon: Making Muon & Scion Great Again! (Bridging Theory and Practice of LMO-based Optimizers for LLMs)cited by 66
- 2019Stochastic Sign Descent Methods: New Algorithms and Better Theorycited by 49
- 2015Coordinate Descent Converges Faster with the Gauss-Southwell Rule Than Random Selectioncited by 39
- 2020The Geometry of Sign Gradient Descentcited by 39
- 2020Acceleration with a Ball Optimization Oraclecited by 31
- 2013Accelerated, Parallel and Proximal Coordinate Descentcited by 25
- 2021Stochastic Bias-Reduced Gradient Methodscited by 25
- 2016Stochastic Block BFGS: Squeezing More Curvature out of Datacited by 24
- 2019Stochastic Newton and Cubic Newton Methods with Simple Local Linear-Quadratic Ratescited by 24
- 2013Distributed Coordinate Descent Method for Learning with Big Datacited by 23
- 2022Optimal and Adaptive Monteiro-Svaiter Accelerationcited by 23
- 2023Normalized Gradients for Allcited by 18
- 2021Thinking Inside the Ball: Near-Optimal Minimization of the Maximal Losscited by 17
- 2023ReSQueing Parallel and Private Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 17
- 2017Let's Make Block Coordinate Descent Converge Faster: Faster Greedy Rules, Message-Passing, Active-Set Complexity, and Superlinear Convergencecited by 16
- 2025MuLoCo: Muon is a practical inner optimizer for DiLoCocited by 16
- 2014Coordinate Descent with Arbitrary Sampling I: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 14
- 2018Accelerated Stochastic Matrix Inversion: General Theory and Speeding up BFGS Rules for Faster Second-Order Optimizationcited by 11
- 2022Distributed Newton-Type Methods with Communication Compression and Bernoulli Aggregationcited by 11
- 2025Muon Optimizer Accelerates Grokkingcited by 11
- 2024Convex optimization with p-norm oraclescited by 5
- 2024Error Feedback under (L0,L1)-Smoothness: Normalization and Momentumcited by 4
- 2020Fast Linear Convergence of Randomized BFGScited by 3
- 2024Closing the Computational-Query Depth Gap in Parallel Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 3
- 2025The Ball-Proximal (="Broximal") Point Method: a New Algorithm, Convergence Theory, and Applicationscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Beyond the Ideal: Analyzing the Inexact Muon Updatecited by 23
- 2025Ky Fan Norms and Beyond: Dual Norms and Combinations for Matrix Optimizationcited by 4
- 2026Local LMO is Secretly a Projection Method!cited by 0
- 2026Local LMO is Secretly a Projection Method!27 Sep 2026
- 2025Ky Fan Norms and Beyond: Dual Norms and Combinations for Matrix Optimization10 Dec 2025
- 2025Beyond the Ideal: Analyzing the Inexact Muon Update22 Oct 2025