mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to rank for uplift modeling

arXiv 2002.05897 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uplift modeling has effectively been used in fields such as marketing and customer retention, to target those customers that are most likely to respond due to the campaign or treatment. Uplift models produce uplift scores which are then used to essentially create a ranking. We instead investigate to learn to rank directly by looking into the potential of learning-to-rank techniques in the context of uplift modeling. We propose a unified formalisation of different global uplift modeling measures in use today and explore how these can be integrated into the learning-to-rank framework. Additionally, we introduce a new metric for learning-to-rank that focusses on optimizing the area under the uplift curve called the promoted cumulative gain (PCG). We employ the learning-to-rank technique LambdaMART to optimize the ranking according to PCG and show improved results over standard learning-to-rank metrics and equal to improved results when compared with state-of-the-art uplift modeling. Finally, we show how learning-to-rank models can learn to optimize a certain targeting depth, however, these results do not generalize on the test set.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Explicit Feature Interaction-aware Uplift Network for Online Marketingcited by 25
  2. 2021A Large Scale Benchmark for Individual Treatment Effect Prediction and Uplift Modelingcited by 12
  3. 2024Network Analytics for Anti-Money Laundering -- A Systematic Literature Review and Experimental Evaluationcited by 7
  4. 2022A new perspective on classification: optimally allocating limited resources to uncertain taskscited by 5
  5. 2024Optimizing Treatment Allocation in the Presence of Interferencecited by 4
  6. 2024Uplift modeling with continuous treatments: A predict-then-optimize approachcited by 4
  7. 2023Uplift vs. predictive modeling: a theoretical analysiscited by 3
  8. 2021To do or not to do: cost-sensitive causal decision-makingcited by 2
  9. 2025Decision-centric fairness: Evaluation and optimization for resource allocation problemscited by 1
  10. 2022Improving uplift model evaluation on RCT datacited by 0
  11. 2023The impact of heteroskedasticity on uplift modelingcited by 0
  12. 2023Multiple Instance Learning for Uplift Modelingcited by 0
6 more
  1. 2024Causal Post-Processing of Predictive Modelscited by 0
  2. 2025The Estimation of Continual Causal Effect for Dataset Shifting Streamscited by 0
  3. 2025Which Company Adjustment Matter? Insights from Uplift Modeling on Financial Healthcited by 0
  4. 2026VALOR: Value-Aware Revenue Uplift Modeling with Treatment-Gated Representation for B2B Salescited by 0
  5. 2026Multi-channel Uplift Policy Learningcited by 0
  6. 2026From Prediction to Incrementality: Causal Optimization for Large-Scale Targeting and Recommendationcited by 0