Uplift modeling with continuous treatments: A predict-then-optimize approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The goal of uplift modeling is to recommend actions that optimize specific outcomes by determining which entities should receive treatment. One common approach involves two steps: first, an inference step that estimates conditional average treatment effects (CATEs), and second, an optimization step that ranks entities based on their CATE values and assigns treatment to the top k within a given budget. While uplift modeling typically focuses on binary treatments, many real-world applications are characterized by continuous-valued treatments, i.e., a treatment dose. This paper presents a predict-then-optimize framework to allow for continuous treatments in uplift modeling. First, in the inference step, conditional average dose responses (CADRs) are estimated from data using causal machine learning techniques. Second, in the optimization step, we frame the assignment task of continuous treatments as a dose-allocation problem and solve it using integer linear programming (ILP). This approach allows decision-makers to efficiently and effectively allocate treatment doses while balancing resource availability, with the possibility of adding extra constraints like fairness considerations or adapting the objective function to take into account instance-dependent costs and benefits to maximize utility. The experiments compare several CADR estimators and illustrate the trade-offs between policy value and fairness, as well as the impact of an adapted objective function. This showcases the framework's advantages and flexibility across diverse applications in healthcare, lending, and human resource management. All code is available on github.com/SimonDeVos/UMCT.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2024.
Builds on
20 of 70 references.
References · 20
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 475
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
- 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 327
- 2023Decision-Focused Learning: Foundations, State of the Art, Benchmark and Future Opportunitiescited by 129
- 2019Learning Counterfactual Representations for Estimating Individual Dose-Response Curvescited by 90
- 2021Fairness in Credit Scoring: Assessment, Implementation and Profit Implicationscited by 65
- 2021VCNet and Functional Targeted Regularization For Learning Causal Effects of Continuous Treatmentscited by 59
- 2018Learning Optimal Fair Policiescited by 49
- 2020A unified survey of treatment effect heterogeneity modeling and uplift modelingcited by 36
- 2022Exploring Transformer Backbones for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 25
- 2021Sequential Deconfounding for Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounderscited by 24
8 more
- 2022Direct Heterogeneous Causal Learning for Resource Allocation Problems in Marketingcited by 21
- 2024Conformal Prediction for Causal Effects of Continuous Treatmentscited by 19
- 2020Learning to rank for uplift modelingcited by 18
- 2019Response Transformation and Profit Decomposition for Revenue Uplift Modelingcited by 15
- 2016Observational-Interventional Priors for Dose-Response Learningcited by 10
- 2023On Prediction-Modelers and Decision-Makers: Why Fairness Requires More Than a Fair Prediction Modelcited by 6
- 2023Retiring DeltaDP: New Distribution-Level Metrics for Demographic Paritycited by 4
- 2024Sources of Gain: Decomposing Performance in Conditional Average Dose Response Estimationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Hidden Representation Clustering with Multi-Task Representation Learning towards Robust Online Budget Allocationcited by 0
- 2026Principles and Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in AI Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Personalizing Marketplace Policies with Competing Objectives and Constrained Experiments: Evidence from a Job Marketplacecited by 0
- 2026Chance-constrained selection of sequential intervention strategies from counterfactual estimatescited by 0
- 2026Chance-constrained selection of sequential intervention strategies from counterfactual estimates13 Aug 2026
- 2026Personalizing Marketplace Policies with Competing Objectives and Constrained Experiments: Evidence from a Job Marketplace29 Jun 2026
- 2026Principles and Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in AI Evaluation3 May 2026
- 2025Hidden Representation Clustering with Multi-Task Representation Learning towards Robust Online Budget Allocation1 Jun 2025