mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multiple Instance Learning for Uplift Modeling

arXiv 2312.09639 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uplift modeling is widely used in performance marketing to estimate effects of promotion campaigns (e.g., increase of customer retention rate). Since it is impossible to observe outcomes of a recipient in treatment (e.g., receiving a certain promotion) and control (e.g., without promotion) groups simultaneously (i.e., counter-factual), uplift models are mainly trained on instances of treatment and control groups separately to form two models respectively, and uplifts are predicted by the difference of predictions from these two models (i.e., two-model method). When responses are noisy and the treatment effect is fractional, induced individual uplift predictions will be inaccurate, resulting in targeting undesirable customers. Though it is impossible to obtain the ideal ground-truth individual uplifts, known as Individual Treatment Effects (ITEs), alternatively, an average uplift of a group of users, called Average Treatment Effect (ATE), can be observed from experimental deliveries. Upon this, similar to Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) in which each training sample is a bag of instances, our framework sums up individual user uplift predictions for each bag of users as its bag-wise ATE prediction, and regularizes it to its ATE label, thus learning more accurate individual uplifts. Additionally, to amplify the fractional treatment effect, bags are composed of instances with adjacent individual uplift predictions, instead of random instances. Experiments conducted on two datasets show the effectiveness and universality of the proposed framework.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2023.

Builds on

16 of 43 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,095
  2. 2017Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Modelscited by 410
  3. 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 287
  4. 2016Statistical Inference for Model Parameters in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 71
  5. 2020Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance Learningcited by 48
  6. 2016Deep Multi-instance Networks with Sparse Label Assignment for Whole Mammogram Classificationcited by 32
  7. 2019Normal Approximation for Stochastic Gradient Descent via Non-Asymptotic Rates of Martingale CLTcited by 30
  8. 2021Estimating Average Treatment Effects via Orthogonal Regularizationcited by 25
  9. 2020Learning to rank for uplift modelingcited by 18
  10. 2018Uplift Modeling from Separate Labelscited by 6
  11. 2020Treatment Targeting by AUUC Maximization with Generalization Guaranteescited by 5
  12. 2017A Practically Competitive and Provably Consistent Algorithm for Uplift Modelingcited by 3
4 more
  1. 2019Address Instance-level Label Prediction in Multiple Instance Learningcited by 2
  2. 2020AMIL: Adversarial Multi Instance Learning for Human Pose Estimationcited by 2
  3. 2013A Decision Theoretic Approach to Targeted Advertisingcited by 1
  4. 2021Multi-Instance Learning by Utilizing Structural Relationship among Instancescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.