AccessShare: Co-designing Data Access and Sharing with Blind People
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Blind people are often called to contribute image data to datasets for AI innovation with the hope for future accessibility and inclusion. Yet, the visual inspection of the contributed images is inaccessible. To this day, we lack mechanisms for data inspection and control that are accessible to the blind community. To address this gap, we engage 10 blind participants in a scenario where they wear smartglasses and collect image data using an AI-infused application in their homes. We also engineer a design probe, a novel data access interface called AccessShare, and conduct a co-design study to discuss participants' needs, preferences, and ideas on consent, data inspection, and control. Our findings reveal the impact of interactive informed consent and the complementary role of data inspection systems such as AccessShare in facilitating communication between data stewards and blind data contributors. We discuss how key insights can guide future informed consent and data control to promote inclusive and responsible data practices in AI.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2024.
Builds on
25 of 108 references.
References · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2018VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind Peoplecited by 858
- 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 171
- 2019The VIA Annotation Software for Images, Audio and Videocited by 167
- 2022Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AIcited by 138
- 2019Lessons from Archives: Strategies for Collecting Sociocultural Data in Machine Learningcited by 116
- 2020Captioning Images Taken by People Who Are Blindcited by 110
- 2023Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Modelscited by 104
- 2019Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspectivecited by 87
- 2024Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commonscited by 46
- 2021ORBIT: A Real-World Few-Shot Dataset for Teachable Object Recognitioncited by 29
- 2023Democratising AI: Multiple Meanings, Goals, and Methodscited by 29
13 more
- 2023ChatGPT Needs SPADE (Sustainability, PrivAcy, Digital divide, and Ethics) Evaluation: A Reviewcited by 28
- 2024On Mechanistic Knowledge Localization in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 28
- 2020Crowdsourcing the Perception of Machine Teachingcited by 9
- 2023Explaining CLIP's performance disparities on data from blind/low vision userscited by 7
- 2020Dark Patterns and the Legal Requirements of Consent Banners: An Interaction Criticism Perspectivecited by 6
- 2022Blind Users Accessing Their Training Images in Teachable Object Recognizerscited by 6
- 2022What's Different between Visual Question Answering for Machine "Understanding" Versus for Accessibility?cited by 6
- 2020Pedestrian Detection with Wearable Cameras for the Blind: A Two-way Perspectivecited by 5
- 2023Inform the uninformed: Improving Online Informed Consent Reading with an AI-Powered Chatbotcited by 5
- 2021Sharing Practices for Datasets Related to Accessibility and Agingcited by 3
- 2020Real-Time Text Detection and Recognitioncited by 2
- 2023Contributing to Accessibility Datasets: Reflections on Sharing Study Data by Blind Peoplecited by 2
- 2022Human-GDPR Interaction: Practical Experiences of Accessing Personal Datacited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.