Efficient Adversarial Training With Data Pruning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks are susceptible to adversarial examples-small input perturbations that cause models to fail. Adversarial training is one of the solutions that stops adversarial examples; models are exposed to attacks during training and learn to be resilient to them. Yet, such a procedure is currently expensive-it takes a long time to produce and train models with adversarial samples, and, what is worse, it occasionally fails. In this paper we demonstrate data pruning-a method for increasing adversarial training efficiency through data sub-sampling.We empirically show that data pruning leads to improvements in convergence and reliability of adversarial training, albeit with different levels of utility degradation. For example, we observe that using random sub-sampling of CIFAR10 to drop 40% of data, we lose 8% adversarial accuracy against the strongest attackers, while by using only 20% of data we lose 14% adversarial accuracy and reduce runtime by a factor of 3. Interestingly, we discover that in some settings data pruning brings benefits from both worlds-it both improves adversarial accuracy and training time.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2022.
Builds on
39 of 48 references.
References · 39
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
27 more
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
- 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
- 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 268
- 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
- 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
- 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
- 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
- 2018Shield: Fast, Practical Defense and Vaccination for Deep Learning using JPEG Compressioncited by 74
- 2021Bad Characters: Imperceptible NLP Attackscited by 69
- 2016Defensive Distillation is Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 60
- 2017Towards Crafting Text Adversarial Samplescited by 55
- 2021Active label cleaning for improved dataset quality under resource constraintscited by 44
- 2019Semantic Redundancies in Image-Classification Datasets: The 10% You Don't Needcited by 43
- 2018Attacks Meet Interpretability: Attribute-steered Detection of Adversarial Samplescited by 38
- 2019Identifying Mislabeled Instances in Classification Datasetscited by 26
- 2022On the Limitations of Stochastic Pre-processing Defensescited by 21
- 2019Blackbox Attacks on Reinforcement Learning Agents Using Approximated Temporal Informationcited by 13
- 2019Is AmI (Attacks Meet Interpretability) Robust to Adversarial Examples?cited by 7
- 2020Continuous Safety Verification of Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2019Sitatapatra: Blocking the Transfer of Adversarial Samplescited by 4
- 2018The Taboo Trap: Behavioural Detection of Adversarial Samplescited by 2
- 2021Understanding the Error in Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 2
- 2019The Efficacy of SHIELD under Different Threat Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Repeated Random Sampling for Minimizing the Time-to-Accuracy of Learningcited by 26
- 2023Less is More: Data Pruning for Faster Adversarial Trainingcited by 13
- 2024Large-Scale Dataset Pruning in Adversarial Training through Data Importance Extrapolationcited by 2
- 2025AdvSumm: Adversarial Training for Bias Mitigation in Text Summarizationcited by 2
- 2025Effective Data Pruning through Score Extrapolationcited by 2
- 2023Intrinsic Biologically Plausible Adversarial Robustnesscited by 1
- 2026Counterfactual Training: Teaching Models Plausible and Actionable Explanationscited by 0
- 2026Counterfactual Training: Teaching Models Plausible and Actionable Explanations22 Jan 2026
- 2025Effective Data Pruning through Score Extrapolation10 Jun 2025
- 2025AdvSumm: Adversarial Training for Bias Mitigation in Text Summarization6 Jun 2025
- 2024Large-Scale Dataset Pruning in Adversarial Training through Data Importance Extrapolation19 Jun 2024
- 2023Intrinsic Biologically Plausible Adversarial Robustness29 Sep 2023
- 2023Repeated Random Sampling for Minimizing the Time-to-Accuracy of Learning28 May 2023
- 2023Less is More: Data Pruning for Faster Adversarial Training23 Feb 2023