Training Dynamic based data filtering may not work for NLP datasets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The recent increase in dataset size has brought about significant advances in natural language understanding. These large datasets are usually collected through automation (search engines or web crawlers) or crowdsourcing which inherently introduces incorrectly labeled data. Training on these datasets leads to memorization and poor generalization. Thus, it is pertinent to develop techniques that help in the identification and isolation of mislabelled data. In this paper, we study the applicability of the Area Under the Margin (AUM) metric to identify and remove/rectify mislabelled examples in NLP datasets. We find that mislabelled samples can be filtered using the AUM metric in NLP datasets but it also removes a significant number of correctly labeled points and leads to the loss of a large amount of relevant language information. We show that models rely on the distributional information instead of relying on syntactic and semantic representations.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2021.
Builds on
20 of 30 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
- 2013Speech Recognition with Deep Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 666
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
8 more
- 2021Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasetscited by 241
- 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 176
- 2020How Can We Accelerate Progress Towards Human-like Linguistic Generalization?cited by 114
- 2020Improved Natural Language Generation via Loss Truncationcited by 75
- 2019Identifying Mislabeled Instances in Classification Datasetscited by 26
- 2019An Effective Label Noise Model for DNN Text Classificationcited by 22
- 2020Learning Embeddings for Image Clustering: An Empirical Study of Triplet Loss Approachescited by 6
- 2021Approximating Instance-Dependent Noise via Instance-Confidence Embeddingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.