Assessing the Quality of the Datasets by Identifying Mislabeled Samples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Due to the over-emphasize of the quantity of data, the data quality has often been overlooked. However, not all training data points contribute equally to learning. In particular, if mislabeled, it might actively damage the performance of the model and the ability to generalize out of distribution, as the model might end up learning spurious artifacts present in the dataset. This problem gets compounded by the prevalence of heavily parameterized and complex deep neural networks, which can, with their high capacity, end up memorizing the noise present in the dataset. This paper proposes a novel statistic -- noise score, as a measure for the quality of each data point to identify such mislabeled samples based on the variations in the latent space representation. In our work, we use the representations derived by the inference network of data quality supervised variational autoencoder (AQUAVS). Our method leverages the fact that samples belonging to the same class will have similar latent representations. Therefore, by identifying the outliers in the latent space, we can find the mislabeled samples. We validate our proposed statistic through experimentation by corrupting MNIST, FashionMNIST, and CIFAR10/100 datasets in different noise settings for the task of identifying mislabelled samples. We further show significant improvements in accuracy for the classification task for each dataset.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2021.
Builds on
27 of 38 references.
References · 27
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
- 2014Semi-Supervised Learning with Deep Generative Modelscited by 494
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
15 more
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
- 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
- 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
- 2020Anomaly Detection With Conditional Variational Autoencoderscited by 46
- 2019Robust Anomaly Detection in Images using Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 38
- 2019Identifying Mislabeled Instances in Classification Datasetscited by 26
- 2016Embracing Error to Enable Rapid Crowdsourcingcited by 15
- 2019Augmenting Variational Autoencoders with Sparse Labels: A Unified Framework for Unsupervised, Semi-(un)supervised, and Supervised Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 9
- 2022Noise Audits Improve Moral Foundation Classificationcited by 7
- 2022Improving Data Quality with Training Dynamics of Gradient Boosting Decision Treescited by 3
- 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Track Memorizationcited by 2
- 2022Do-AIQ: A Design-of-Experiment Approach to Quality Evaluation of AI Mislabel Detection Algorithmcited by 0
- 2024Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Data Mining Perspective9 Jan 2024
- 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Track Memorization8 Dec 2022
- 2022Improving Data Quality with Training Dynamics of Gradient Boosting Decision Trees20 Oct 2022
- 2022Noise Audits Improve Moral Foundation Classification13 Oct 2022
- 2022Do-AIQ: A Design-of-Experiment Approach to Quality Evaluation of AI Mislabel Detection Algorithm21 Aug 2022