mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Robustness with Adaptive Weight Decay

arXiv 2210.00094 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose adaptive weight decay, which automatically tunes the hyper-parameter for weight decay during each training iteration. For classification problems, we propose changing the value of the weight decay hyper-parameter on the fly based on the strength of updates from the classification loss (i.e., gradient of cross-entropy), and the regularization loss (i.e., ℓ2-norm of the weights). We show that this simple modification can result in large improvements in adversarial robustness -- an area which suffers from robust overfitting -- without requiring extra data across various datasets and architecture choices. For example, our reformulation results in 20% relative robustness improvement for CIFAR-100, and 10% relative robustness improvement on CIFAR-10 comparing to the best tuned hyper-parameters of traditional weight decay resulting in models that have comparable performance to SOTA robustness methods. In addition, this method has other desirable properties, such as less sensitivity to learning rate, and smaller weight norms, which the latter contributes to robustness to overfitting to label noise, and pruning.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2022.

Builds on

47 of 72 references.

References · 47

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  8. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  9. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  10. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  11. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  12. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
35 more
  1. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  2. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  3. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  4. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  5. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  6. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  7. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
  8. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 685
  9. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  10. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  11. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  12. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  13. 2022Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Modelcited by 559
  14. 2017Large Batch Training of Convolutional Networkscited by 535
  15. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
  16. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
  17. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  18. 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 334
  19. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 278
  20. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
  21. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 227
  22. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
  23. 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 204
  24. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  25. 2020GridMask Data Augmentationcited by 123
  26. 2021Re-labeling ImageNet: from Single to Multi-Labels, from Global to Localized Labelscited by 118
  27. 2018Three Mechanisms of Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 113
  28. 2017Shake-Shake regularizationcited by 87
  29. 2018On the Suitability of Lp-norms for Creating and Preventing Adversarial Examplescited by 58
  30. 2021Probabilistic Margins for Instance Reweighting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 57
  31. 2019Instance adaptive adversarial training: Improved accuracy tradeoffs in neural netscited by 55
  32. 2018ShakeDrop Regularization for Deep Residual Learningcited by 40
  33. 2019Identifying Mislabeled Instances in Classification Datasetscited by 26
  34. 2018Resource-Efficient Neural Architectcited by 14
  35. 2019Adaptive Weight Decay for Deep Neural Networkscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort: