mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DPM: A deep learning PDE augmentation method (with application to large-eddy simulation)

arXiv 1911.09145 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2019cs.LG cs.CE stat.MLcited by 40

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning for scientific applications faces the challenge of limited data. We propose a framework that leverages a priori known physics to reduce overfitting when training on relatively small datasets. A deep neural network is embedded in a partial differential equation (PDE) that expresses the known physics and learns to describe the corresponding unknown or unrepresented physics from the data. Crafted as such, the neural network can also provide corrections for erroneously represented physics, such as discretization errors associated with the PDE's numerical solution. Once trained, the deep learning PDE model (DPM) can make out-of-sample predictions for new physical parameters, geometries, and boundary conditions. Our approach optimizes over the functional form of the PDE. Estimating the embedded neural network requires optimizing over the entire PDE, which itself is a function of the neural network. Adjoint partial differential equations are used to efficiently calculate the high-dimensional gradient of the objective function with respect to the neural network parameters. A stochastic adjoint method (SAM), similar in spirit to stochastic gradient descent, further accelerates training. The approach is demonstrated and evaluated for turbulence predictions using large-eddy simulation (LES), a filtered version of the Navier--Stokes equation containing unclosed sub-filter-scale terms. The DPM outperforms the widely-used constant-coefficient and dynamic Smagorinsky models, even for filter sizes so large that these established models become qualitatively incorrect. It also significantly outperforms a priori trained models, which do not account for the full PDE. A relaxation of the discrete enforcement of the divergence-free constraint is also considered, instead allowing the DPM to approximately enforce incompressibility physics.

Key facts. Cited by 40 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 10; 2023: 6; 2024: 5; 2025: 9; 2026: 4.

40 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 461
  2. 2021Learned Coarse Models for Efficient Turbulence Simulationcited by 90
  3. 2023Benchmarking Autoregressive Conditional Diffusion Models for Turbulent Flow Simulationcited by 65
  4. 2022Learned Turbulence Modelling with Differentiable Fluid Solvers: Physics-based Loss-functions and Optimisation Horizonscited by 39
  5. 2022JAX-FLUIDS: A fully-differentiable high-order computational fluid dynamics solver for compressible two-phase flowscited by 36
  6. 2022A posteriori learning for quasi-geostrophic turbulence parametrizationcited by 36
  7. 2024Data-Efficient Operator Learning via Unsupervised Pretraining and In-Context Learningcited by 32
  8. 2022Data-driven Control of Agent-based Models: an Equation/Variable-free Machine Learning Approachcited by 15
  9. 2021Embedded training of neural-network sub-grid-scale turbulence modelscited by 13
  10. 2022Multiscale Neural Operator: Learning Fast and Grid-independent PDE Solverscited by 12
  11. 2021PDE-constrained Models with Neural Network Terms: Optimization and Global Convergencecited by 11
  12. 2022Deep Learning Closure Models for Large-Eddy Simulation of Flows around Bluff Bodiescited by 11
28 more
  1. 2023Generalized Neural Closure Models with Interpretabilitycited by 8
  2. 2024JAX-Fluids 2.0: Towards HPC for Differentiable CFD of Compressible Two-phase Flowscited by 7
  3. 2022AutoKE: An automatic knowledge embedding framework for scientific machine learningcited by 6
  4. 2022Comparison of neural closure models for discretised PDEscited by 6
  5. 2023Gradient-free online learning of subgrid-scale dynamics with neural emulatorscited by 5
  6. 2025PICT -- A Differentiable, GPU-Accelerated Multi-Block PISO Solver for Simulation-Coupled Learning Tasks in Fluid Dynamicscited by 5
  7. 2023Dynamic Deep Learning LES Closures: Online Optimization With Embedded DNScited by 4
  8. 2025INC: An Indirect Neural Corrector for Auto-Regressive Hybrid PDE Solverscited by 3
  9. 2022Probabilistic partition of unity networks for high-dimensional regression problemscited by 2
  10. 2024A TVD neural network closure and application to turbulent combustioncited by 2
  11. 2021Learning Transport Processes with Machine Intelligencecited by 1
  12. 2022Exploring Physical Latent Spaces for High-Resolution Flow Restorationcited by 1
  13. 2023Differentiable Turbulence: Closure as a partial differential equation constrained optimizationcited by 1
  14. 2025NORi: An ML-Augmented Ocean Boundary Layer Parameterizationcited by 1
  15. 2021SPDCinv: Inverse Quantum-Optical Design of High-Dimensional Quditscited by 0
  16. 2023A Spectral Approach for Learning Spatiotemporal Neural Differential Equationscited by 0
  17. 2024Learning-based Multi-continuum Model for Multiscale Flow Problemscited by 0
  18. 2024Rational-WENO: A lightweight, physically-consistent three-point weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemecited by 0
  19. 2025Multi-level datasets training method in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 0
  20. 2025LaPON: A Lagrange's-mean-value-theorem-inspired operator network for solving PDEs and its application on NSEcited by 0
  21. 2025OGF: An Online Gradient Flow Method for Optimizing the Statistical Steady-State Time Averages of Unsteady Turbulent Flowscited by 0
  22. 2025Physics-Based Machine Learning Closures and Wall Models for Hypersonic Transition-Continuum Boundary Layer Predictionscited by 0
  23. 2025Active Control of Turbulent Airfoil Flows Using Adjoint-based Deep Learningcited by 0
  24. 2025Addressing A Posteriori Performance Degradation in Neural Network Subgrid Stress Modelscited by 0
  25. 2026Deep Learning-based Algebraic Reynolds Stress Closures for RANS Simulations of Turbulent Flowscited by 0
  26. 2026Spectrally Regularized Latent Flow Matching for Turbulence Generationcited by 0
  27. 2026Flux-form spatiotemporal neural operators for coarse-grained dynamics of multiscale PDEscited by 0
  28. 2026Improving Reduced-Order Rotating Detonation Engine Models with Data Assimilation and Machine Learningcited by 0