mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Learning Closure Models for Large-Eddy Simulation of Flows around Bluff Bodies

arXiv 2208.03498 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2022physics.flu-dyn cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A deep learning (DL) closure model for large-eddy simulation (LES) is developed and evaluated for incompressible flows around a rectangular cylinder at moderate Reynolds numbers. Near-wall flow simulation remains a central challenge in aerodynamic modeling: RANS predictions of separated flows are often inaccurate, while LES can require prohibitively small near-wall mesh sizes. The DL-LES model is trained using adjoint PDE optimization methods to match, as closely as possible, direct numerical simulation (DNS) data. It is then evaluated out-of-sample (i.e., for new aspect ratios and Reynolds numbers not included in the training data) and compared against a standard LES model (the dynamic Smagorinsky model). The DL-LES model outperforms dynamic Smagorinsky and is able to achieve accurate LES predictions on a relatively coarse mesh (downsampled from the DNS grid by a factor of four in each Cartesian direction). We study the accuracy of the DL-LES model for predicting the drag coefficient, mean flow, and Reynolds stress. A crucial challenge is that the LES quantities of interest are the steady-state flow statistics; for example, the time-averaged mean velocity baru(x) = displaystyle limt rightarrow ∞ frac1t int0t u(s,x) ds. Calculating the steady-state flow statistics therefore requires simulating the DL-LES equations over a large number of flow times through the domain; it is a non-trivial question whether an unsteady partial differential equation model whose functional form is defined by a deep neural network can remain stable and accurate on t ∈ [0, ∞). Our results demonstrate that the DL-LES model is accurate and stable over large physical time spans, enabling the estimation of the steady-state statistics for the velocity, fluctuations, and drag coefficient of turbulent flows around bluff bodies relevant to aerodynamic applications.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2022.

Builds on

7 of 34 references.

References · 7

  1. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
  2. 2021Scientific multi-agent reinforcement learning for wall-models of turbulent flowscited by 52
  3. 2019DPM: A deep learning PDE augmentation method (with application to large-eddy simulation)cited by 40
  4. 2018Deep Neural Networks for Data-Driven Turbulence Modelscited by 35
  5. 2021Embedded training of neural-network sub-grid-scale turbulence modelscited by 13
  6. 2021PDE-constrained Models with Neural Network Terms: Optimization and Global Convergencecited by 11
  7. 2022Comparative analysis of machine learning methods for active flow controlcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 8; 2026: 2.

11 papers.