mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

OGF: An Online Gradient Flow Method for Optimizing the Statistical Steady-State Time Averages of Unsteady Turbulent Flows

arXiv 2507.05149 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2025physics.flu-dyn cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Turbulent flows are chaotic and unsteady, but their statistical distribution converges to a statistical steady state. Engineering quantities of interest typically take the form of time-average statistics such as frac1t int0t f ( u(x,τ; θ) ) dτ oversett rightarrow ∞rightarrow F(x; θ), where u(x,t; θ) are solutions of the Navier--Stokes equations with parameters θ. Optimizing over F(x; θ) has many engineering applications including geometric optimization, flow control, and closure modeling. However, this remains an open challenge, as existing computational approaches are incapable of scaling to physically representative numbers of grid points. The fundamental obstacle is the chaoticity of turbulent flows: gradients calculated with the adjoint method diverge exponentially as t rightarrow ∞. We develop a new online gradient-flow (OGF) method that is scalable to large degree-of-freedom systems and enables optimizing for the steady-state statistics of chaotic, unsteady, turbulence-resolving simulations. The method forward-propagates an online estimate for the gradient of F(x; θ) while simultaneously performing online updates of the parameters θ. A key feature is the fully online nature of the algorithm to facilitate faster optimization progress and its combination with a finite-difference estimator to avoid the divergence of gradients due to chaoticity. The proposed OGF method is demonstrated for optimizations over three chaotic ordinary and partial differential equations: the Lorenz-63 equation, the Kuramoto--Sivashinsky equation, and Navier--Stokes solutions of compressible, forced, homogeneous isotropic turbulence. In each case, the OGF method successfully reduces the loss based on F(x; θ) by several orders of magnitude and accurately recovers the optimal parameters.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.

Builds on

15 of 86 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learningcited by 73
  2. 2021Scientific multi-agent reinforcement learning for wall-models of turbulent flowscited by 52
  3. 2019DPM: A deep learning PDE augmentation method (with application to large-eddy simulation)cited by 41
  4. 2019Control of chaotic systems by Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
  5. 2016Stochastic Gradient Descent in Continuous Timecited by 14
  6. 2021Embedded training of neural-network sub-grid-scale turbulence modelscited by 13
  7. 2021PDE-constrained Models with Neural Network Terms: Optimization and Global Convergencecited by 12
  8. 2022Deep Learning Closure Models for Large-Eddy Simulation of Flows around Bluff Bodiescited by 11
  9. 2021Optimal Transport for Parameter Identification of Chaotic Dynamics via Invariant Measurescited by 10
  10. 2016Sensitivity analysis on chaotic dynamical system by Non-Intrusive Least Square Shadowing (NILSS)cited by 6
  11. 2020Two-Timescale Stochastic Gradient Descent in Continuous Time with Applications to Joint Online Parameter Estimation and Optimal Sensor Placementcited by 6
  12. 2022Continuous-time stochastic gradient descent for optimizing over the stationary distribution of stochastic differential equationscited by 4
3 more
  1. 2022A Forward Propagation Algorithm for Online Optimization of Nonlinear Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 4
  2. 2022Multi-agent reinforcement learning for wall modeling in LES of flow over periodic hillscited by 2
  3. 2022Sensitivity analysis of chaotic systems using a frequency-domain shadowing approachcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.