mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Differentiable Turbulence: Closure as a partial differential equation constrained optimization

arXiv 2307.03683 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2023physics.flu-dyn cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning is increasingly becoming a promising pathway to improving the accuracy of sub-grid scale (SGS) turbulence closure models for large eddy simulations (LES). We leverage the concept of differentiable turbulence, whereby an end-to-end differentiable solver is used in combination with physics-inspired choices of deep learning architectures to learn highly effective and versatile SGS models for two-dimensional turbulent flow. We perform an in-depth analysis of the inductive biases in the chosen architectures, finding that the inclusion of small-scale non-local features is most critical to effective SGS modeling, while large-scale features can improve pointwise accuracy of the textita-posteriori solution field. The velocity gradient tensor on the LES grid can be mapped directly to the SGS stress via decomposition of the inputs and outputs into isotropic, deviatoric, and anti-symmetric components. We see that the model can generalize to a variety of flow configurations, including higher and lower Reynolds numbers and different forcing conditions. We show that the differentiable physics paradigm is more successful than offline, textita-priori learning, and that hybrid solver-in-the-loop approaches to deep learning offer an ideal balance between computational efficiency, accuracy, and generalization. Our experiments provide physics-based recommendations for deep-learning based SGS modeling for generalizable closure modeling of turbulence.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2023.

Builds on

18 of 68 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  3. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  4. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 471
  5. 2020Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solverscited by 205
  6. 2019Towards Physics-informed Deep Learning for Turbulent Flow Predictioncited by 204
  7. 2021Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learningcited by 138
  8. 2020Learning to Control PDEs with Differentiable Physicscited by 132
  9. 2021Learned Coarse Models for Efficient Turbulence Simulationcited by 91
  10. 2019DPM: A deep learning PDE augmentation method (with application to large-eddy simulation)cited by 41
  11. 2022Learned Turbulence Modelling with Differentiable Fluid Solvers: Physics-based Loss-functions and Optimisation Horizonscited by 39
  12. 2022JAX-FLUIDS: A fully-differentiable high-order computational fluid dynamics solver for compressible two-phase flowscited by 36
6 more
  1. 2022A posteriori learning for quasi-geostrophic turbulence parametrizationcited by 36
  2. 2020A Perspective on Machine Learning Methods in Turbulence Modellingcited by 23
  3. 2022Explaining the physics of transfer learning a data-driven subgrid-scale closure to a different turbulent flowcited by 20
  4. 2023Differentiable hybrid neural modeling for fluid-structure interactioncited by 18
  5. 2020Physical invariance in neural networks for subgrid-scale scalar flux modelingcited by 13
  6. 2022Towards prediction of turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers using high performance computing data and deep learningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.