mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Flux-form spatiotemporal neural operators for coarse-grained dynamics of multiscale PDEs

arXiv 2608.18148 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026nlin.CD cs.LG math.APcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study data-driven prediction of coarse-grained dynamics in multiscale PDE systems. Adopting a closure-free operator-learning viewpoint, we apply a linear coarse-graining map and learn a surrogate evolution operator for the resolved field directly from filtered high-fidelity trajectories. Motivated by the Mori-Zwanzig formalism, we propose a spatiotemporal neural operator mapping a resolved history slab on Omega×[-Tin,0] to a resolved future slab on Omega×[0,Tout]. Spatial mixing uses Fourier convolution, while temporal mixing uses a causal kernel operator with position-attention weights on time lags. This causal temporal operator encodes finite-memory effects in the resolved dynamics while preserving the directionality of the history-to-future map. To improve rollout robustness and suppress nonconservative artifacts, we embed a flux-form inductive bias by parameterizing the windowed update in explicit divergence form. We also provide a data-driven guideline for selecting the memory length Tin via the decorrelation time of a closure-injection diagnostic computed from filtered trajectories. We validate on the coarse-grained viscous Burgers' equation, the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, and two-dimensional turbulent flows, obtaining stable autoregressive rollouts with improved long-horizon accuracy and statistical fidelity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

20 of 46 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  3. 2018Data Driven Governing Equations Approximation Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 96
  4. 2022Neural Conservation Laws: A Divergence-Free Perspectivecited by 70
  5. 2021Learning Dissipative Dynamics in Chaotic Systemscited by 42
  6. 2019DPM: A deep learning PDE augmentation method (with application to large-eddy simulation)cited by 41
  7. 2022Learned Turbulence Modelling with Differentiable Fluid Solvers: Physics-based Loss-functions and Optimisation Horizonscited by 39
  8. 2023Harnessing the Power of Neural Operators with Automatically Encoded Conservation Lawscited by 24
  9. 2018Model Reduction with Memory and the Machine Learning of Dynamical Systemscited by 21
  10. 2018Data-driven Discovery of Closure Modelscited by 20
  11. 2020Learning reduced systems via deep neural networks with memorycited by 20
  12. 2023Flow Map Learning for Unknown Dynamical Systems: Overview, Implementation, and Benchmarkscited by 18
8 more
  1. 2024Positional Knowledge is All You Need: Position-induced Transformer (PiT) for Operator Learningcited by 17
  2. 2021Embedded training of neural-network sub-grid-scale turbulence modelscited by 13
  3. 2023Neural Ideal Large Eddy Simulation: Modeling Turbulence with Neural Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 13
  4. 2024Spectral-Refiner: Accurate Fine-Tuning of Spatiotemporal Fourier Neural Operator for Turbulent Flowscited by 11
  5. 2021Machine learning moment closure models for the radiative transfer equation I: directly learning a gradient based closurecited by 9
  6. 2021Machine learning moment closure models for the radiative transfer equation II: enforcing global hyperbolicity in gradient based closurescited by 7
  7. 2021Machine learning moment closure models for the radiative transfer equation III: enforcing hyperbolicity and physical characteristic speedscited by 6
  8. 2022Comparison of neural closure models for discretised PDEscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.