mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Transport Processes with Machine Intelligence

arXiv 2109.13096 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2021physics.plasm-ph cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a machine learning based approach to address the study of transport processes, ubiquitous in continuous mechanics, with particular attention to those phenomena ruled by complex micro-physics, impractical to theoretical investigation, yet exhibiting emergent behavior describable by a closed mathematical expression. Our machine learning model, built using simple components and following a few well established practices, is capable of learning latent representations of the transport process substantially closer to the ground truth than expected from the nominal error characterising the data, leading to sound generalisation properties. This is demonstrated through an idealized study of the long standing problem of heat flux suppression relevant to fusion and cosmic plasmas. Our analysis shows that the result applies beyond those case specific assumptions and that, in particular, the accuracy of the learned representation is controllable through knowledge of the data quality (error properties) and a suitable choice of the dataset size. While the learned representation can be used as a plug-in for numerical modeling purposes, it can also be leveraged with the above error analysis to obtain reliable mathematical expressions describing the transport mechanism and of great theoretical value.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2021.

Builds on

22 of 69 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  3. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
  4. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,360
  5. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
  6. 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 494
  7. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 471
  8. 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
  9. 2020Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 353
  10. 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 344
  11. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
  12. 2018Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and controlcited by 244
10 more
  1. 2020Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solverscited by 205
  2. 2019Towards Physics-informed Deep Learning for Turbulent Flow Predictioncited by 204
  3. 2019Ab-Initio Solution of the Many-Electron Schr"odinger Equation with Deep Neural Networkscited by 200
  4. 2018Deep Fluids: A Generative Network for Parameterized Fluid Simulationscited by 121
  5. 2019Physics-informed Autoencoders for Lyapunov-stable Fluid Flow Predictioncited by 67
  6. 2019DPM: A deep learning PDE augmentation method (with application to large-eddy simulation)cited by 41
  7. 2020Building high accuracy emulators for scientific simulations with deep neural architecture searchcited by 36
  8. 2020Using Machine Learning to Augment Coarse-Grid Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulationscited by 24
  9. 2021Learning the exchange-correlation functional from nature with fully differentiable density functional theorycited by 23
  10. 2020Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Aided Joint Processing Coordinated Multipoint Transmissioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.