mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fast classification rates without standard margin assumptions

arXiv 1910.12756 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2019cs.LG math.ST stat.MLcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the classical problem of learning rates for classes with finite VC dimension. It is well known that fast learning rates up to Oleft(fracdnright) are achievable by the empirical risk minimization algorithm (ERM) if low noise or margin assumptions are satisfied. These usually require the optimal Bayes classifier to be in the class, and it has been shown that when this is not the case, the fast rates cannot be achieved even in the noise free case. In this paper, we further investigate the question of the fast rates under the misspecification, when the Bayes classifier is not in the class (also called the agnostic setting). First, we consider classification with a reject option, namely Chow's reject option model, and show that by slightly lowering the impact of hard instances, a learning rate of order Oleft(fracdnlog fracndright) is always achievable in the agnostic setting by a specific learning algorithm. Similar results were only known under special versions of margin assumptions. We also show that the performance of the proposed algorithm is never worse than the performance of ERM. Based on those results, we derive the necessary and sufficient conditions for classification (without a reject option) with fast rates in the agnostic setting achievable by improper learners. This simultaneously extends the work of Massart and N'ed'elec (Ann. of Statistics, 2006), which studied this question in the case where the Bayesian optimal rule belongs to the class, and the work of Ben-David and Urner (COLT, 2014), which allows the misspecification but is limited to the no noise setting. Our result also provides the first general setup in statistical learning theory in which an improper learning algorithm may significantly improve the learning rate for non-convex losses.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: