mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exponential Tail Local Rademacher Complexity Risk Bounds Without the Bernstein Condition

arXiv 2202.11461 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2022math.ST cs.LG stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The local Rademacher complexity framework is one of the most successful general-purpose toolboxes for establishing sharp excess risk bounds for statistical estimators based on the framework of empirical risk minimization. Applying this toolbox typically requires using the Bernstein condition, which often restricts applicability to convex and proper settings. Recent years have witnessed several examples of problems where optimal statistical performance is only achievable via non-convex and improper estimators originating from aggregation theory, including the fundamental problem of model selection. These examples are currently outside of the reach of the classical localization theory. In this work, we build upon the recent approach to localization via offset Rademacher complexities, for which a general high-probability theory has yet to be established. Our main result is an exponential-tail excess risk bound expressed in terms of the offset Rademacher complexity that yields results at least as sharp as those obtainable via the classical theory. However, our bound applies under an estimator-dependent geometric condition (the "offset condition") instead of the estimator-independent (but, in general, distribution-dependent) Bernstein condition on which the classical theory relies. Our results apply to improper prediction regimes not directly covered by the classical theory.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2022.

Builds on

20 of 98 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019Mean estimation and regression under heavy-tailed distributions--a surveycited by 133
  2. 2013Early stopping and non-parametric regression: An optimal data-dependent stopping rulecited by 86
  3. 2014Learning without Concentrationcited by 50
  4. 2021Stability and Deviation Optimal Risk Bounds with Convergence Rate O(1/n)cited by 42
  5. 2018Logistic Regression: The Importance of Being Impropercited by 40
  6. 2015Learning with Square Loss: Localization through Offset Rademacher Complexitycited by 37
  7. 2014Optimal learning with Bernstein Online Aggregationcited by 35
  8. 2014Logistic Regression: Tight Bounds for Stochastic and Online Optimizationcited by 30
  9. 2017Early stopping for kernel boosting algorithms: A general analysis with localized complexitiescited by 27
  10. 2019An improper estimator with optimal excess risk in misspecified density estimation and logistic regressioncited by 24
  11. 2021Exponential Savings in Agnostic Active Learning through Abstentioncited by 23
  12. 2013Empirical entropy, minimax regret and minimax riskcited by 21
8 more
  1. 2020The Statistical Complexity of Early-Stopped Mirror Descentcited by 19
  2. 2021Distribution-Free Robust Linear Regressioncited by 19
  3. 2014The Sample Complexity of Learning Linear Predictors with the Squared Losscited by 16
  4. 2019Fast classification rates without standard margin assumptionscited by 16
  5. 2014Learning without Concentration for General Loss Functionscited by 13
  6. 2015Iterative Regularization for Learning with Convex Loss Functionscited by 9
  7. 2020Suboptimality of Constrained Least Squares and Improvements via Non-Linear Predictorscited by 9
  8. 2021Localization, Convexity, and Star Aggregationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

9 papers.