mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Towards optimally abstaining from prediction with OOD test examples

arXiv 2105.14119 ↗First posted 28 May 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.DScited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A common challenge across all areas of machine learning is that training data is not distributed like test data, due to natural shifts, "blind spots," or adversarial examples; such test examples are referred to as out-of-distribution (OOD) test examples. We consider a model where one may abstain from predicting, at a fixed cost. In particular, our transductive abstention algorithm takes labeled training examples and unlabeled test examples as input, and provides predictions with optimal prediction loss guarantees. The loss bounds match standard generalization bounds when test examples are i.i.d. from the training distribution, but add an additional term that is the cost of abstaining times the statistical distance between the train and test distribution (or the fraction of adversarial examples). For linear regression, we give a polynomial-time algorithm based on Celis-Dennis-Tapia optimization algorithms. For binary classification, we show how to efficiently implement it using a proper agnostic learner (i.e., an Empirical Risk Minimizer) for the class of interest. Our work builds on a recent abstention algorithm of Goldwasser, Kalais, and Montasser (2020) for transductive binary classification.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2021.

Builds on

4 of 33 references.

References · 4

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,336
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,137
  3. 2019Fast classification rates without standard margin assumptionscited by 16
  4. 2014A note on polynomial solvability of the CDT problemcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.