Auditing for Diversity using Representative Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Assessing the diversity of a dataset of information associated with people is crucial before using such data for downstream applications. For a given dataset, this often involves computing the imbalance or disparity in the empirical marginal distribution of a protected attribute (e.g. gender, dialect, etc.). However, real-world datasets, such as images from Google Search or collections of Twitter posts, often do not have protected attributes labeled. Consequently, to derive disparity measures for such datasets, the elements need to hand-labeled or crowd-annotated, which are expensive processes. We propose a cost-effective approach to approximate the disparity of a given unlabeled dataset, with respect to a protected attribute, using a control set of labeled representative examples. Our proposed algorithm uses the pairwise similarity between elements in the dataset and elements in the control set to effectively bootstrap an approximation to the disparity of the dataset. Importantly, we show that using a control set whose size is much smaller than the size of the dataset is sufficient to achieve a small approximation error. Further, based on our theoretical framework, we also provide an algorithm to construct adaptive control sets that achieve smaller approximation errors than randomly chosen control sets. Simulations on two image datasets and one Twitter dataset demonstrate the efficacy of our approach (using random and adaptive control sets) in auditing the diversity of a wide variety of datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2021.
Builds on
12 of 39 references.
References · 12
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
- 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 209
- 2016Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American Englishcited by 196
- 2019Fair Generative Modeling via Weak Supervisioncited by 114
- 2019Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combinationcited by 79
- 2013Semi-supervised clustering methodscited by 18
- 2019Implicit Diversity in Image Summarizationcited by 18
- 2020Dialect Diversity in Text Summarization on Twittercited by 17
- 2019Female Librarians and Male Computer Programmers? Gender Bias in Occupational Images on Digital Media Platformscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
2 papers.
- 2022Designing Closed Human-in-the-loop Deferral Pipelinescited by 11
- 2023On Measuring Fairness in Generative Modelscited by 8
- 2023On Measuring Fairness in Generative Models30 Oct 2023
- 2022Designing Closed Human-in-the-loop Deferral Pipelines9 Feb 2022