mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bias-Aware Agent: Enhancing Fairness in AI-Driven Knowledge Retrieval

arXiv 2503.21237 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2025cs.IR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Advancements in retrieving accessible information have evolved faster in the last few years compared to the decades since the internet's creation. Search engines, like Google, have been the number one way to find relevant data. They have always relied on the user's abilities to find the best information in its billions of links and sources at everybody's fingertips. The advent of large language models (LLMs) has completely transformed the field of information retrieval. The LLMs excel not only at retrieving relevant knowledge but also at summarizing it effectively, making information more accessible and consumable for users. On top of it, the rise of AI Agents has introduced another aspect to information retrieval i.e. dynamic information retrieval which enables the integration of real-time data such as weather forecasts, and financial data with the knowledge base to curate context-aware knowledge. However, despite these advancements the agents remain susceptible to issues of bias and fairness, challenges deeply rooted within the knowledge base and training of LLMs. This study introduces a novel approach to bias-aware knowledge retrieval by leveraging agentic framework and the innovative use of bias detectors as tools to identify and highlight inherent biases in the retrieved content. By empowering users with transparency and awareness, this approach aims to foster more equitable information systems and promote the development of responsible AI.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2025.

Builds on

13 of 42 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
  4. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  5. 2016Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputscited by 81
  6. 2019Policy Learning for Fairness in Rankingcited by 74
  7. 2023Information Retrieval: Recent Advances and Beyondcited by 49
  8. 2021Societal Biases in Retrieved Contents: Measurement Framework and Adversarial Mitigation for BERT Rankerscited by 34
  9. 2018Reducing Disparate Exposure in Ranking: A Learning To Rank Approachcited by 33
  10. 2023An In-depth Survey of Large Language Model-based Artificial Intelligence Agentscited by 30
  11. 2022Dbias: Detecting biases and ensuring Fairness in news articlescited by 28
  12. 2024Does RAG Introduce Unfairness in LLMs? Evaluating Fairness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemscited by 26
1 more
  1. 2024Improving Retrieval Augmented Open-Domain Question-Answering with Vectorized Contextscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Knowledge-Aware Iterative Retrieval for Multi-Agent Systems
  2. 2025Agent-centric Information Access
  3. 2025A Survey of Large Language Model Empowered Agents for Recommendation and Search: Towards Next-Generation Information Retrieval
  4. 2026Agent-Orchestrated Adaptive RAG: A Comparative Study on Structured and Multi-Hop Retrieval
  5. 2025From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents
  6. 2025Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAG
  7. 2025A Multi-Agent Perspective on Modern Information Retrieval
  8. 2025InfoDeepSeek: Benchmarking Agentic Information Seeking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation