Debiasing Neural Retrieval via In-batch Balancing Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
People frequently interact with information retrieval (IR) systems, however, IR models exhibit biases and discrimination towards various demographics. The in-processing fair ranking methods provide a trade-offs between accuracy and fairness through adding a fairness-related regularization term in the loss function. However, there haven't been intuitive objective functions that depend on the click probability and user engagement to directly optimize towards this. In this work, we propose the In-Batch Balancing Regularization (IBBR) to mitigate the ranking disparity among subgroups. In particular, we develop a differentiable textitnormed Pairwise Ranking Fairness (nPRF) and leverage the T-statistics on top of nPRF over subgroups as a regularization to improve fairness. Empirical results with the BERT-based neural rankers on the MS MARCO Passage Retrieval dataset with the human-annotated non-gendered queries benchmark citeprekabsaz2020neural show that our IBBR method with nPRF achieves significantly less bias with minimal degradation in ranking performance compared with the baseline.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2022.
Builds on
19 of 27 references.
References · 19
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
- 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 629
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
- 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
- 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
- 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
- 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
- 2018iFair: Learning Individually Fair Data Representations for Algorithmic Decision Makingcited by 64
7 more
- 2015Deep Sentence Embedding Using Long Short-Term Memory Networks: Analysis and Application to Information Retrievalcited by 54
- 2021Societal Biases in Retrieved Contents: Measurement Framework and Adversarial Mitigation for BERT Rankerscited by 34
- 2018Reducing Disparate Exposure in Ranking: A Learning To Rank Approachcited by 33
- 2021Fairness in Ranking: A Surveycited by 33
- 2020Do Neural Ranking Models Intensify Gender Bias?cited by 28
- 2020Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utilitycited by 9
- 2021Fairness Through Regularization for Learning to Rankcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Surveycited by 22
- 2025EqualizeIR: Mitigating Linguistic Biases in Retrieval Modelscited by 5
- 2023EALM: Introducing Multidimensional Ethical Alignment in Conversational Information Retrievalcited by 2
- 2023FERI: A Multitask-based Fairness Achieving Algorithm with Applications to Fair Organ Transplantationcited by 2
- 2026MBD: A Model-Based Debiasing Framework Across User, Content, and Model Dimensionscited by 0
- 2026MBD: A Model-Based Debiasing Framework Across User, Content, and Model Dimensions15 Mar 2026
- 2025EqualizeIR: Mitigating Linguistic Biases in Retrieval Models22 Mar 2025
- 2023FERI: A Multitask-based Fairness Achieving Algorithm with Applications to Fair Organ Transplantation20 Oct 2023
- 2023EALM: Introducing Multidimensional Ethical Alignment in Conversational Information Retrieval2 Oct 2023
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Survey10 Nov 2022