mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MOReGIn: Multi-Objective Recommendation at the Global and Individual Levels

arXiv 2401.12593 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2024cs.IR cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-Objective Recommender Systems (MORSs) emerged as a paradigm to guarantee multiple (often conflicting) goals. Besides accuracy, a MORS can operate at the global level, where additional beyond-accuracy goals are met for the system as a whole, or at the individual level, meaning that the recommendations are tailored to the needs of each user. The state-of-the-art MORSs either operate at the global or individual level, without assuming the co-existence of the two perspectives. In this study, we show that when global and individual objectives co-exist, MORSs are not able to meet both types of goals. To overcome this issue, we present an approach that regulates the recommendation lists so as to guarantee both global and individual perspectives, while preserving its effectiveness. Specifically, as individual perspective, we tackle genre calibration and, as global perspective, provider fairness. We validate our approach on two real-world datasets, publicly released with this paper.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2024.

Builds on

22 of 50 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
  2. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 443
  3. 2018Towards Deep Conversational Recommendationscited by 174
  4. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  5. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  6. 2021User-oriented Fairness in Recommendationcited by 75
  7. 2021User-centered Evaluation of Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 38
  8. 2020The Connection Between Popularity Bias, Calibration, and Fairness in Recommendationcited by 35
  9. 2018Reducing Disparate Exposure in Ranking: A Learning To Rank Approachcited by 33
  10. 2018Exploring Author Gender in Book Rating and Recommendationcited by 29
  11. 2022Toward Pareto Efficient Fairness-Utility Trade-off inRecommendation through Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
  12. 2022CPFair: Personalized Consumer and Producer Fairness Re-ranking for Recommender Systemscited by 29
10 more
  1. 2021Elliot: a Comprehensive and Rigorous Framework for Reproducible Recommender Systems Evaluationcited by 28
  2. 2021Multi-FR: A Multi-objective Optimization Framework for Multi-stakeholder Fairness-aware Recommendationcited by 25
  3. 2022Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for Recommendationcited by 22
  4. 2021Choosing the Best of Both Worlds: Diverse and Novel Recommendations through Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
  5. 2020Equality of Learning Opportunity via Individual Fairness in Personalized Recommendationscited by 13
  6. 2020Fair Multi-Stakeholder News Recommender System with Hypergraph rankingcited by 6
  7. 2021What is fair? Exploring the artists' perspective on the fairness of music streaming platformscited by 5
  8. 2021Long-Tail Session-based Recommendation from Calibrationcited by 3
  9. 2022Multi-Objective Recommender Systems: Survey and Challengescited by 1
  10. 2023Looks Can Be Deceiving: Linking User-Item Interactions and User's Propensity Towards Multi-Objective Recommendationscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.