Robust Estimation of Sparse Numerical Vectors under Local Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Local differential privacy (LDP) protocols are vulnerable to poisoning attacks. Existing research have proposed efficient defense strategies for single-item users. However, in practice, a user may possess multiple items. The defense against poisoning attacks for multi-item users is challenging, because due to larger output spaces, the adversary can conduct more powerful attacks without being detected. In this paper, we address the robust sparse vector mean estimation problem, in which each user has a vector with m nonzero coordinates. We propose Randomized Projection with Clipping (RPC). Firstly, the server sends a random binary vector to each user. The user then projects its local data on the vector, and clip the value to restrict the attacker's capability. To handle clipping bias, we propose a correction method based on a careful analysis that gives an exact expression of the bias. As a result, bias-variance tradeoff is no longer needed, thus the clipping threshold can be further reduced to shrink the output space and enhance robustness. We provide a rigorous theoretical guarantee of the estimation error under all possible attacks. Numerical experiments show that under trusted environments, our new method achieves comparable or better performance than existing methods, indicating that our method is already an efficient estimator in its own right. Under untrusted environments, our method is also significantly more robust to poisoning attacks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.
Builds on
29 of 58 references.
References · 29
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
- 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 220
- 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 164
- 2018Protection Against Reconstruction and Its Applications in Private Federated Learningcited by 130
- 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 107
- 2021Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential Privacycited by 69
- 2020Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Trilemmacited by 68
- 2019Collecting and Analyzing Multidimensional Data with Local Differential Privacycited by 49
- 2021Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential Privacycited by 37
- 2017Optimal Schemes for Discrete Distribution Estimation under Locally Differential Privacycited by 29
- 2022Stronger Privacy Amplification by Shuffling for R'enyi and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 29
17 more
- 2019Manipulation Attacks in Local Differential Privacycited by 28
- 2018Hadamard Response: Estimating Distributions Privately, Efficiently, and with Little Communicationcited by 26
- 2019Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocolscited by 26
- 2016Collecting and Analyzing Data from Smart Device Users with Local Differential Privacycited by 25
- 2019Estimating Numerical Distributions under Local Differential Privacycited by 17
- 2023Fast Optimal Locally Private Mean Estimation via Random Projectionscited by 14
- 2020Lightweight Techniques for Private Heavy Hitterscited by 13
- 2019Locally Differentially Private Frequency Estimation with Consistencycited by 12
- 2021Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Key-Value Datacited by 10
- 2022Fine-grained Poisoning Attack to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Mean and Variance Estimationcited by 9
- 2019PCKV: Locally Differentially Private Correlated Key-Value Data Collection with Optimized Utilitycited by 6
- 2024On the Robustness of LDP Protocols for Numerical Attributes under Data Poisoning Attackscited by 5
- 2024Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset Mining Protocolscited by 5
- 2018Calibrate: Frequency Estimation and Heavy Hitter Identification with Local Differential Privacy via Incorporating Prior Knowledgecited by 4
- 2023Differentially Private Numerical Vector Analyses in the Local and Shuffle Modelcited by 2
- 2024Almost Instance-optimal Clipping for Summation Problems in the Shuffle Model of Differential Privacycited by 1
- 2025Consistent Estimation of Numerical Distributions under Local Differential Privacy by Wavelet Expansioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.