Algorithms for bounding contribution for histogram estimation under user-level privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of histogram estimation under user-level differential privacy, where the goal is to preserve the privacy of all entries of any single user. We consider the heterogeneous scenario where the quantity of data can be different for each user. In this scenario, the amount of noise injected into the histogram to obtain differential privacy is proportional to the maximum user contribution, which can be amplified by few outliers. One approach to circumvent this would be to bound (or limit) the contribution of each user to the histogram. However, if users are limited to small contributions, a significant amount of data will be discarded. In this work, we propose algorithms to choose the best user contribution bound for histogram estimation under both bounded and unbounded domain settings. When the size of the domain is bounded, we propose a user contribution bounding strategy that almost achieves a two-approximation with respect to the best contribution bound in hindsight. For unbounded domain histogram estimation, we propose an algorithm that is logarithmic-approximation with respect to the best contribution bound in hindsight. This result holds without any distribution assumptions on the data. Experiments on both real and synthetic datasets verify our theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithms. We also show that clipping bias introduced by bounding user contribution may be reduced under mild distribution assumptions, which can be of independent interest.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2022.
Builds on
22 of 50 references.
References · 22
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
- 2018Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learningcited by 242
- 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 218
- 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 216
- 2020Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 152
- 2018Privately Learning High-Dimensional Distributionscited by 103
- 2019Generative Models for Effective ML on Private, Decentralized Datasetscited by 85
- 2018A General Approach to Adding Differential Privacy to Iterative Training Procedurescited by 84
- 2020Private Mean Estimation of Heavy-Tailed Distributionscited by 73
10 more
- 2021Learning with User-Level Privacycited by 72
- 2020Differentially Private Assouad, Fano, and Le Camcited by 54
- 2020Learning discrete distributions: user vs item-level privacycited by 41
- 2021Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential Privacycited by 37
- 2019Federated Learning of N-gram Language Modelscited by 33
- 2018Inference under Information Constraints I: Lower Bounds from Chi-Square Contractioncited by 31
- 2019Differentially Private SQL with Bounded User Contributioncited by 27
- 2018Hadamard Response: Estimating Distributions Privately, Efficiently, and with Little Communicationcited by 26
- 2021Tight and Robust Private Mean Estimation with Few Userscited by 26
- 2019Differentially private anonymized histogramscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024PrE-Text: Training Language Models on Private Federated Data in the Age of LLMscited by 29
- 2024Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with User-Level Differential Privacycited by 28
- 2025Private Federated Multiclass Post-hoc Calibrationcited by 0
- 2026DP-LAC: Lightweight Adaptive Clipping for Differentially Private Federated Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026DP-LAC: Lightweight Adaptive Clipping for Differentially Private Federated Fine-tuning of Language Models11 May 2026
- 2025Private Federated Multiclass Post-hoc Calibration2 Oct 2025
- 2024Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with User-Level Differential Privacy10 Jul 2024
- 2024PrE-Text: Training Language Models on Private Federated Data in the Age of LLMs5 Jun 2024