mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Granger-causal Attentive Mixtures of Experts: Learning Important Features with Neural Networks

arXiv 1802.02195 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2018cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 13

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE theory and gating functions

Abstract (arXiv)

Knowledge of the importance of input features towards decisions made by machine-learning models is essential to increase our understanding of both the models and the underlying data. Here, we present a new approach to estimating feature importance with neural networks based on the idea of distributing the features of interest among experts in an attentive mixture of experts (AME). AMEs use attentive gating networks trained with a Granger-causal objective to learn to jointly produce accurate predictions as well as estimates of feature importance in a single model. Our experiments show (i) that the feature importance estimates provided by AMEs compare favourably to those provided by state-of-the-art methods, (ii) that AMEs are significantly faster at estimating feature importance than existing methods, and (iii) that the associations discovered by AMEs are consistent with those reported by domain experts.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE theory and gating functions, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 31 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2018.

Builds on

31 of 73 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  6. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  8. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  9. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  10. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  11. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  12. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
19 more
  1. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
  2. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  3. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  4. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  5. 2016RETAIN: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Healthcare using Reverse Time Attention Mechanismcited by 344
  6. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  7. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  8. 2015Explaining NonLinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decompositioncited by 248
  9. 2017Distral: Robust Multitask Reinforcement Learningcited by 231
  10. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  11. 2017Multi-task Self-Supervised Visual Learningcited by 200
  12. 2015Conditional Computation in Neural Networks for faster modelscited by 166
  13. 2015Reasoning about Entailment with Neural Attentioncited by 68
  14. 2017Beyond Sparsity: Tree Regularization of Deep Models for Interpretabilitycited by 68
  15. 2017MDNet: A Semantically and Visually Interpretable Medical Image Diagnosis Networkcited by 56
  16. 2016Auditing Black-box Models for Indirect Influencecited by 41
  17. 2014Deep Networks with Internal Selective Attention through Feedback Connectionscited by 17
  18. 2017Classification of Radiology Reports Using Neural Attention Modelscited by 5
  19. 2017Beat by Beat: Classifying Cardiac Arrhythmias with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2019: 1; 2020: 1; 2021: 4; 2022: 0; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Neural Additive Experts: Context-Gated Experts for Controllable Model Additivity
  2. 2024Sparse Mixture-of-Experts for Compositional Generalization: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Foundations of Optimal Sparsity
  3. 2026Neural Thickets: Diverse Task Experts Are Dense Around Pretrained Weights
  4. 2025Sparsity and Superposition in Mixture of Experts
  5. 2022Functional mixture-of-experts for classification
  6. 2023Improving Expert Specialization in Mixture of Experts
  7. 2025Mixture of Experts Provably Detect and Learn the Latent Cluster Structure in Gradient-Based Learning
  8. 2026Sparsely gated tiny linear experts