Training Deep Models to be Explained with Fewer Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Although deep models achieve high predictive performance, it is difficult for humans to understand the predictions they made. Explainability is important for real-world applications to justify their reliability. Many example-based explanation methods have been proposed, such as representer point selection, where an explanation model defined by a set of training examples is used for explaining a prediction model. For improving the interpretability, reducing the number of examples in the explanation model is important. However, the explanations with fewer examples can be unfaithful since it is difficult to approximate prediction models well by such example-based explanation models. The unfaithful explanations mean that the predictions by the explainable model are different from those by the prediction model. We propose a method for training deep models such that their predictions are faithfully explained by explanation models with a small number of examples. We train the prediction and explanation models simultaneously with a sparse regularizer for reducing the number of examples. The proposed method can be incorporated into any neural network-based prediction models. Experiments using several datasets demonstrate that the proposed method improves faithfulness while keeping the predictive performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2021.
Builds on
20 of 30 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2017Dynamic Routing Between Capsulescited by 689
- 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 403
- 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 237
8 more
- 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
- 2017Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 161
- 2015The Bayesian Case Model: A Generative Approach for Case-Based Reasoning and Prototype Classificationcited by 76
- 2019Regularizing Black-box Models for Improved Interpretabilitycited by 35
- 2018Granger-causal Attentive Mixtures of Experts: Learning Important Features with Neural Networkscited by 13
- 2018Feature Selection using Stochastic Gatescited by 12
- 2020Gaussian Process Regression with Local Explanationcited by 6
- 2020Neural Generators of Sparse Local Linear Models for Achieving both Accuracy and Interpretabilitycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.