Learning Channel Importance for High Content Imaging with Interpretable Deep Input Channel Mixing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uncovering novel drug candidates for treating complex diseases remain one of the most challenging tasks in early discovery research. To tackle this challenge, biopharma research established a standardized high content imaging protocol that tags different cellular compartments per image channel. In order to judge the experimental outcome, the scientist requires knowledge about the channel importance with respect to a certain phenotype for decoding the underlying biology. In contrast to traditional image analysis approaches, such experiments are nowadays preferably analyzed by deep learning based approaches which, however, lack crucial information about the channel importance. To overcome this limitation, we present a novel approach which utilizes multi-spectral information of high content images to interpret a certain aspect of cellular biology. To this end, we base our method on image blending concepts with alpha compositing for an arbitrary number of channels. More specifically, we introduce DCMIX, a lightweight, scaleable and end-to-end trainable mixing layer which enables interpretable predictions in high content imaging while retaining the benefits of deep learning based methods. We employ an extensive set of experiments on both MNIST and RXRX1 datasets, demonstrating that DCMIX learns the biologically relevant channel importance without scarifying prediction performance.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2023.
Builds on
24 of 53 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
- 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 571
- 2016RETAIN: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Healthcare using Reverse Time Attention Mechanismcited by 344
- 2017A Structured Self-attentive Sentence Embeddingcited by 318
12 more
- 2021FastSHAP: Real-Time Shapley Value Estimationcited by 123
- 2022The Shapley Value in Machine Learningcited by 97
- 2019LassoNet: A Neural Network with Feature Sparsitycited by 81
- 2015Supersparse Linear Integer Models for Optimized Medical Scoring Systemscited by 76
- 2019Deep Image Blendingcited by 62
- 2023RxRx1: A Dataset for Evaluating Experimental Batch Correction Methodscited by 45
- 2017Sparse-Input Neural Networks for High-dimensional Nonparametric Regression and Classificationcited by 39
- 2021groupShapley: Efficient prediction explanation with Shapley values for feature groupscited by 21
- 2019BS-Nets: An End-to-End Framework For Band Selection of Hyperspectral Imagecited by 14
- 2018Granger-causal Attentive Mixtures of Experts: Learning Important Features with Neural Networkscited by 13
- 2018Learning Sparse Latent Representations with the Deep Copula Information Bottleneckcited by 9
- 2021Individual Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Survey for Practitionerscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.