mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Thickets: Diverse Task Experts Are Dense Around Pretrained Weights

arXiv 2603.12228 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pretraining produces a learned parameter vector that is typically treated as a starting point for further iterative adaptation. In this work, we instead view the outcome of pretraining as a distribution over parameter vectors, whose support already contains task-specific experts. We show that in small models such expert solutions occupy a negligible fraction of the volume of this distribution, making their discovery reliant on structured optimization methods such as gradient descent. In contrast, in large, well-pretrained models the density of task-experts increases dramatically, so that diverse, task-improving specialists populate a substantial fraction of the neighborhood around the pretrained weights. Motivated by this perspective, we explore a simple, fully parallel post-training method that samples N parameter perturbations at random, selects the top K, and ensembles predictions via majority vote. Despite its simplicity, this approach is competitive with standard post-training methods such as PPO, GRPO, and ES for contemporary large-scale models.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.

Builds on

42 of 52 references.

References · 42

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  7. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  8. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  9. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  10. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  11. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  12. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
30 more
  1. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  2. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  3. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
  4. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 895
  5. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
  6. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
  7. 2021Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters Using Megatron-LMcited by 621
  8. 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 555
  9. 2020Rethinking Few-Shot Image Classification: a Good Embedding Is All You Need?cited by 435
  10. 2015Illuminating search spaces by mapping elitescited by 406
  11. 2017Population Based Training of Neural Networkscited by 351
  12. 2017Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for freecited by 349
  13. 2024Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 282
  14. 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 278
  15. 2025Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVRcited by 199
  16. 2020Linear Mode Connectivity in Multitask and Continual Learningcited by 144
  17. 2025A Minimalist Approach to LLM Reasoning: from Rejection Sampling to Reinforcecited by 141
  18. 2020Bayesian Neural Networks: An Introduction and Surveycited by 130
  19. 2018Simple random search provides a competitive approach to reinforcement learningcited by 75
  20. 2017Meta-Learning and Universality: Deep Representations and Gradient Descent can Approximate any Learning Algorithmcited by 65
  21. 2020Efficient Continuous Pareto Exploration in Multi-Task Learningcited by 57
  22. 2020Navigating the GAN Parameter Space for Semantic Image Editingcited by 49
  23. 2024Interpreting the Weight Space of Customized Diffusion Modelscited by 35
  24. 2025Evolution Strategies at Scale: LLM Fine-Tuning Beyond Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  25. 2024Noise Injection Reveals Hidden Capabilities of Sandbagging Language Modelscited by 22
  26. 2026Learning to Reason in 13 Parameterscited by 13
  27. 2025MATH-Beyond: A Benchmark for RL to Expand Beyond the Base Modelcited by 10
  28. 2020PEP: Parameter Ensembling by Perturbationcited by 9
  29. 2026The Blessing of Dimensionality in LLM Fine-tuning: A Variance-Curvature Perspectivecited by 9
  30. 2020Analyzing Reinforcement Learning Benchmarks with Random Weight Guessingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 25.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026Rethinking Muon Beyond Pretraining: Spectral Failures and High-Pass Remedies for VLA and RLVRcited by 5
  2. 2026Pretraining Recurrent Networks without Recurrencecited by 5
  3. 2026Is One Layer Enough? Training A Single Transformer Layer Can Match Full-Parameter RL Trainingcited by 3
  4. 2026First-Order Predictable but Pairwise Fragile: Local Task Adaptation in Trained Transformerscited by 3
  5. 2026Overcoming Forgetting in LLM Fine-Tuning with Evolution Strategiescited by 2
  6. 2026Beyond the Best Guess: Improving LLM Solution Coverage with Evolution Strategiescited by 2
  7. 2026Agentic ESOpt: Fine-Tuning Long-Horizon LLM Agents with Minimal GPU Requirementscited by 2
  8. 2026Nonsense Helps: Prompt Space Perturbation Broadens Reasoning Explorationcited by 1
  9. 2026Consolidating Rewarded Perturbations for LLM Post-Trainingcited by 1
  10. 2026Recoverable but Not Stationary:Local Linear Structures in Weights and Activationscited by 1
  11. 2026SOAP-Bubbles: Structured Weight Uncertainty for Neural Networkscited by 1
  12. 2026Hyper-ES: Effective Evolution Strategies for LLM Reasoning via Descent Direction Mergingcited by 1
13 more
  1. 2026Understanding Evolution Strategies for LLM Reasoning: Broader Reasoning Coverage than GRPOcited by 1
  2. 2026OptiMer: Optimal Distribution Vector Merging Is Better than Data Mixing for Continual Pre-Trainingcited by 0
  3. 2026TAPIOCA: Why Task- Aware Pruning Improves OOD model Capabilitycited by 0
  4. 2026Don't Let Gains FADE: Breaking Down Policy Gradient Weights in RLcited by 0
  5. 2026Interleaved Noise Injection Improves Clean, Corrupted, and OOD Performancecited by 0
  6. 2026Parameter Exploration for RLVR via Variational Learningcited by 0
  7. 2026Good Pretraining, Bad SFT: Checkpoint Quality Across the Training Stackcited by 0
  8. 2026Hill Sampling for Test-Time Scaling: A Simple and Better Alternative to Repeated Sampling, Evolution, and Trainingcited by 0
  9. 2026Modular Norm RandOpt: Population-Efficient Ensembling through Architecture-Aware Perturbationscited by 0
  10. 2026Better Supervision Is Nearby: Neighborhood On-Policy Self-Distillationcited by 0
  11. 2026Adapter Thickets: Splitting an RLVR Budget Beats Concentrating Itcited by 0
  12. 2026Learning to Predict Distributions over Weight Updates for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 0
  13. 2026Input-Blind Controls Produce Substantial Oracle Headroom for Layer Programs in Multiple-Choice Evaluationcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Beyond Parameter Count: Implicit Bias in Soft Mixture of Experts
  2. 2026The Expert Strikes Back: Interpreting Mixture-of-Experts Language Models at Expert Level
  3. 2026Emergent Specialization in Populations of Self-Supervised Collaborative Vision Experts Without a Shared Gate or Cross-Agent Gradients
  4. 2026Deconstructing Pre-training: Knowledge Attribution Analysis in MoE and Dense Models
  5. 2025Beyond Benchmarks: Understanding Mixture-of-Experts Models through Internal Mechanisms
  6. 2025Multi-Task Dense Prediction Fine-Tuning with Mixture of Fine-Grained Experts
  7. 2024Sparse Mixture-of-Experts for Compositional Generalization: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Foundations of Optimal Sparsity
  8. 2025Symphony-MoE: Harmonizing Disparate Pre-trained Models into a Coherent Mixture-of-Experts