mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pragmatic-Pedagogic Value Alignment

arXiv 1707.06354 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2017cs.AI cs.HC cs.LGcited by 36

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As intelligent systems gain autonomy and capability, it becomes vital to ensure that their objectives match those of their human users; this is known as the value-alignment problem. In robotics, value alignment is key to the design of collaborative robots that can integrate into human workflows, successfully inferring and adapting to their users' objectives as they go. We argue that a meaningful solution to value alignment must combine multi-agent decision theory with rich mathematical models of human cognition, enabling robots to tap into people's natural collaborative capabilities. We present a solution to the cooperative inverse reinforcement learning (CIRL) dynamic game based on well-established cognitive models of decision making and theory of mind. The solution captures a key reciprocity relation: the human will not plan her actions in isolation, but rather reason pedagogically about how the robot might learn from them; the robot, in turn, can anticipate this and interpret the human's actions pragmatically. To our knowledge, this work constitutes the first formal analysis of value alignment grounded in empirically validated cognitive models.

Key facts. Cited by 36 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2018: 2; 2019: 0; 2020: 2; 2021: 7; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 9; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

36 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2020Human-in-the-Loop Imitation Learning using Remote Teleoperationcited by 103
  2. 2020Safe Imitation Learning via Fast Bayesian Reward Inference from Preferencescited by 73
  3. 2024Building Machines that Learn and Think with Peoplecited by 73
  4. 2024Pragmatic Instruction Following and Goal Assistance via Cooperative Language-Guided Inverse Planningcited by 28
  5. 2021Human irrationality: both bad and good for reward inferencecited by 25
  6. 2022Law Informs Code: A Legal Informatics Approach to Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humanscited by 23
  7. 2021Cognitive science as a source of forward and inverse models of human decisions for robotics and controlcited by 22
  8. 2022How to talk so AI will learn: Instructions, descriptions, and autonomycited by 22
  9. 2023Inferring the Goals of Communicating Agents from Actions and Instructionscited by 17
  10. 2018An Efficient, Generalized Bellman Update For Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  11. 2022Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethicscited by 11
  12. 2025AssistanceZero: Scalably Solving Assistance Gamescited by 10
24 more
  1. 2021Learning Altruistic Behaviours in Reinforcement Learning without External Rewardscited by 8
  2. 2021Emergence of Theory of Mind Collaboration in Multiagent Systemscited by 8
  3. 2024Pragmatic Feature Preferences: Learning Reward-Relevant Preferences from Human Inputcited by 8
  4. 2021Iterative Teacher-Aware Learningcited by 6
  5. 2024Pragmatic Embodied Spoken Instruction Following in Human-Robot Collaboration with Theory of Mindcited by 6
  6. 2023Attention Schema in Neural Agentscited by 4
  7. 2024Enhancing Human Experience in Human-Agent Collaboration: A Human-Centered Modeling Approach Based on Positive Human Gaincited by 4
  8. 2025Communication-Efficient Desire Alignment for Embodied Agent-Human Adaptationcited by 4
  9. 2021Explaining Reward Functions to Humans for Better Human-Robot Collaborationcited by 3
  10. 2024Reinforcement Learning and Machine ethics:a systematic reviewcited by 3
  11. 2021Dynamically Switching Human Prediction Models for Efficient Planningcited by 2
  12. 2022Pragmatically Learning from Pedagogical Demonstrations in Multi-Goal Environmentscited by 2
  13. 2023Goal Alignment: A Human-Aware Account of Value Alignment Problemcited by 1
  14. 2024Understanding Subjectivity through the Lens of Motivational Context in Model-Generated Image Satisfactioncited by 1
  15. 2024Explainable Moral Values: a neuro-symbolic approach to value classificationcited by 1
  16. 2025Research Superalignment Should Advance Now with Alternating Competence and Conformity Optimizationcited by 1
  17. 2025Beyond Algorethics: Addressing the Ethical and Anthropological Challenges of AI Recommender Systemscited by 1
  18. 2018A Roadmap for Robust End-to-End Alignmentcited by 0
  19. 2023Can Differentiable Decision Trees Enable Interpretable Reward Learning from Human Feedback?cited by 0
  20. 2024Online Policy Learning from Offline Preferencescited by 0
  21. 2025AI Agents and Hard Choicescited by 0
  22. 2026Relative Principals, Pluralistic Alignment, and the Structural Value Alignment Problemcited by 0
  23. 2026AI Coaching for Accelerating Human Skill Development with Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  24. 2026Corrigible Assistance in One Round: Pragmatic-Pedagogic Best Responsecited by 0